Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/23/2017 in all areas

  1. 30 points
    Fabunil

    And now Jingles is gone

    Atleast we get the chance to create some dank memes out of this shitshow.
  2. 29 points
    RollerCoaster47

    And now Jingles is gone

    WGNA are a bunch of retarded faggots. Just when the drama was about to be over they go full autism mode. You can't even mention anything about the drama on the WoT NA forums or else the mods will delete your thread within minutes and give you forum bans. They truly are the stupidest gaming company alive. If WG actually goes after Foch and this goes to court somehow I would personally donate money to Foch's case.
  3. 21 points
    Whole_Nutmeg

    And now Jingles is gone

    OP please all you have to do is post the link for the embed RIP though, I remember when I was a noob back in 2013 and found jingle's channel, I loved all of his old videos where he played the ISU 152 like an idiot but laughed manically when he one-shotted tier 6s. I haven't watched much of his content for the past 2-3 years, but I appreciate his contributions to the community, his general positivity, and his passion for his channel. I have no idea what kind of PR disaster is going on, this seems like some kind of KGB tactic to use the "SJW" trend to moderate negative content that goes against WG's policies and economic interests (as I have no doubt that WG doesn't give a rat's ass about the internet culture war). Whatever's going on, this announcement is HORRIBLE news for WG. I don't even know how you can recover from your #1 content creator jumping ship. Maybe Jingles will get a nice letter and check from Victor Kislyi and a Belarussian mail-order bride to bring him back into their fold? But this seems like a pretty definitive decision. I only wish I could see what is going on in WG internal emails and video conference calls right now... This is absolute mayhem and I have more than enough to enjoy the storm
  4. 4 points
    Finally get a spare moment to chat only to discover that chat is kill 7
  5. 4 points
    The chieftain is too historical for WG to bring back, plus it has weak spots in the form of its hull, both of which go against WGs balance policy.
  6. 3 points
    So after buying the GTX 1080, I've now bought Battlefield 1, Overwatch and GTA V. Rip money, having a job is dank and FeelsAmazingMan not having a trash PC.
  7. 3 points
    This guy: https://clips.twitch.tv/ConfidentGoodCookieDxCat
  8. 3 points
    Whole_Nutmeg

    And now Jingles is gone

    @RollerCoaster47 You really don't mince words, do you?
  9. 3 points
    OperatorError

    Chrysler K GF

    Fuckoff WarGaming.
  10. 2 points
    An article worth reading. https://ritastatusreport.live/2017/05/23/the-chrysler-k-in-the-bigger-picture/
  11. 2 points
    This morning in the WG EU offices: WG_EU_Community_Manager: I think we have this under control. At the very least it can't get any worse then it already is. This morning in the NA offices: WG_NA_Community_Manager: *walks in, sees that EU is resolving their problem, decides that this just won't stand* HOLD MAH BEEEER!!!!!!!!!! Several hours later at the EU offices: Jingles: I'm out, bro! Random less important CC: Me to! WG_EU_Community_Manager: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK.
  12. 2 points
    Its not so awful anymore. https://www.mediafire.com/?dbyxq2bja5n4ats Type 62, averages right around 2k dpg for 40ish battles. It used to be bad, then it was good, then it was awful, and now its pretty good again, except that terrible HEAT shell cost that just needs to be brought down from 12g/4800silver to what? 8? 9? So that even when you pen your gold shells you aren't losing credits. Its not like the 62 makes massive profits anyhow right? Oh and a bonus Lakeville domination from Friday http://wotreplays.com/site/3603139#lakeville-crabeatoff-type_62
  13. 2 points
    That would be a group, mensch = person, menschen = group of people Not my fault english has so many usefull words, yet at the same time lacks many usefull words In regards to the OT part: This is a forum about world of tanks, Sir foch streams world of tanks, talking about an OP / badly balanced premium tank, which will influence our world of tanks games. Meanwhile a world of tanks forumtard admin goes full retard on said world of tanks streamer, leading to a small ``shit``storm. Did i mention this was a forum about world of tanks and that we discus world of tanks topic(s?)
  14. 2 points
  15. 2 points
    Fuck arty Wargaming
  16. 1 point
    lordawesome7

    opinions on sirfoch being censored?

    if you guys don't know tl;dr SirFoch spoke negatively about WG premium tank policy and got threaten (and thus censored) by EU branch of WG and in turn removed his community contributor status (his video afterwards here: https://youtu.be/VT36zcdnAKM ) as a result, people got pissed and you can see the end result yourself on the release video or look down here i really don't want WG to go down the route that gajin did with censorship, but this is the first step to just that, i am even less inclined to spend money then i already am, even if its just EU, i am not happy with what is happening put simply all we can do as a community is let them know we don't condone this and they will greatly damage both EU and NA communities if they continue such actions PS: feel free to move this to another sub forum if it doesn't fit here, wasn't 100% on that Edit: found the video that was taken down if you want to see what was taken down https://www.facebook.com/WorldofTanksPolskaFanPage/videos/1071566622943302/?hc_location=ufi Edit: staff response to community backlash; which its one thing to remove his CC status but pulling his video down is actively censoring him, no way to downplay that (more here : http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/629174-wg-going-batshit-over-ccs/page__p__14293729#entry14293729 )
  17. 1 point
    https://worldoftanks.eu/en/news/general-news/sirfoch-incident/
  18. 1 point
    http://wotreplays.com/site/3368615#ruinberg-icygunner-churchill_iii -->11 kills its an old replay from the previous patch, idk if its works, but it worth a try
  19. 1 point
    Draw Battle: Mines Vehicles: 121 Experience received: 1,712 Credits earned: 98,792 Battle achievements: 3 Marks of Excellence, High Caliber, Confederate, Mastery Badge: "I Class" 92-95 8 games
  20. 1 point
    Archaic_One

    opinions on sirfoch being censored?

    Lots of people post videos far more critical of WG policy every day on a variety of platforms across social media. In fact, Foch is free to continue to post scathing searing videos condemning every facet of WG products and policies on Youtube or any other platform - WG just does not have to pay him for it. As far as the threat to levy a DMCA Strike against him never materialized because it was all bark and no bite. They could delete his WG account and ban him from the community, but they have very little sway over what he says beyond that. Now, you're a lawyer and I'm a geologist - so we probably have a very different take on this, but WG has just as much right to control the message emanating from their CCs as their CCs have to go rogue and bite the hand that feeds them. Ph3lans actions were douchey and in reality he probably lacks the authority to even carry out his threats - that would be the decision of the WG EU legal team to actually approach Youtube and convince them to take down content that had previously been endorsed by WG. I understand libel laws in the EU are pretty draconian so maybe he was in more jeopardy than he would be here - I don't know. The thing is, those 18th century craftsman did not have snapchat, and instagram, and tumblr, and facebook, and dozens of other outlets for their voices. Its very hard to silence somebody that can log in to multiple different venues under a dozen different user names all with zero legal ramifications. Hell, the real threat to speech today is not censorship - its noise from competing sources. Foch has far more outlets for his Voice than Thomas Paine had so I have a hard time feeling like Foch got censored in a way that makes WG culpable for anything more than douchebaggery.
  21. 1 point
    Sorry I was in a hurry and wanted to respond fast. No problems with my English, sometimes I just write too fast. English is my main language in work and understanding what people are trying to communicate is basically my life as I'm a movie buyer and most acquisitions are based off scripts. Sorry about the messy post. I'm on a trade event right now so a mix of hangover, low amount sleep and spare time is not working well for me. Now to get to your point. " I believe we should trust that WG's grounds for removal of the video was being offensive to WG employeeThat was what WG said about their own logic and I would assume that a person can explain their logic behind an action, thus why I believe we should trust that WG's grounds for removal of the video was being offensive to WG employees" - This is the same reasoning from the first post. I understood it well. You basically say that we should trust WG's explanation if they say thing A was what caused them to take action. The thing is they can lie. Given that previously I worked in PR and I get info how my and other companies handle PR lying is OBVIOUSLY big part of your public relations. What I AM saying is we should not trust WG's explanation for their logic behind the whole move against Foch. The move might have as well been motivated by the need to censor him but OBVIOUSLY they can't say "hey guys we wanted to censor foch because his video was negative about our new product". This is exactly why you can't trust their official statements. Especially since at the same time they went after another contributor for a different video which may not be a coincidence and may indicate a change of politics regarding youtubers/contributors. It is a real possibility given that contributors have been recently more critical of War Gaming than usual and even QB gave them some flak for t10 light tank nerfs. I've worked under bosses who in similar situations would go after censorship and then deny it. So my experience tells me it is entirely possible they are lying. Also WG called Foch Homophobic on Kotaku. You really want to trust them when they do shit like that? You look at this only from one angle. Trier 8 tanks can see 5 different triers of tanks 6,7,8,9 and 10. OP premiums are not a big problem for only 2 out of 5 of those triers. Also even as top trier if enemy bottom trier tanks are OP and yours are shit given same skill level it may still mean a loss if the teams are equally balanced on high triers. It's a smaller problem but in the long run it has an influence on the game.
  22. 1 point
    C A L C U L A T E D https://clips.twitch.tv/ResilientAbstruseParrotBudStar?tt_medium=clips_api&tt_content=url
  23. 1 point
    it's definitely not a problem when most tier 8s nowadays is comprised of premium tanks on each team, right?
  24. 1 point
    Lemme try it..."I suck!" Okay, so I'm a better player now, right? Darn...didn't work.
  25. 1 point
    Regardless of game longevity, I think we can all agree that these premiums detract from game health and balance. Whether the game dies in 3 months or 3 years, it doesn't really matter, especially if it isn't enjoyable to play because of the new monetization model.