Got Fired
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Kolni

  • Rank
    DPGwhoring saltlord
  • Birthday 03/27/1995

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
  • Server

Recent Profile Visitors

180,296 profile views
  1. currently averaging 4870 DPG in the Foch 155 after 18 games in it, didn't even break a sweat :serb: 

    who said this tank was bad when you have a 2k dmg clip and autopen heat? :kjugh: 

    1. Show previous comments  3 more
    2. zapyoug


      Back in the day, I had the same experience until I got meme'd on like 10 games in a row

    3. GehakteMolen


      just lucky RNG, try 20 more games :P

    4. Kolni


      It's frustrating when the platform doesnt let you do anything but tank is good

      42 games and still 4700 DPG

  2. mSbNFWp.jpg

    really tried to go for 4k avg and 80% hitrate for a nice aestethically pleasing screenshot but this will have to do :^)

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. 1n_Soviet_Russia


      800 battles and already higher than most WoT players, top fucking kek.

    3. HemanathanRX7


      70%wr and 4k dpg, crazy as always Kolni :P 

    4. Cunicularius
  3. +1 416 -3 50 100 add pls phone is stupid
  4. tfw ppl havent realised WN8 changes so now ur best tank per class+tier is your best padder
  5. What if I say it? For me the step from 2k to 3k took longer than the step from 3k to 4k. I never really bothered with padding either. It's all about consistency. A good game for me 2 years ago is by my standards unacceptably bad. 3K damage in a game I didnt get bullshitted on? I dont even remember the last time that happened. Knowing lineups and predicting gameplay is all you're going to need for that push. CarbonWard showed me that you can just autoaim and be lazy and still perform as long as you're in the right place at the right time. The game played in your head will start to matter more and more as you progress and eventually the mechanical skills you have will barely matter anymore.
  6. IS-3: 20M26 Pershing: 17T32: 20Object 416: 21 (+1, 330 HEAT makes it by far the best damage farmer because it's ability to put out damage remains the same despite the changes, a tier 8 that can rape a Maus almost as fast as a 907 can? sign me up)AMX 50 100: 17 (-3 this tank was ebola to play even before all the broken tier 8s came out)Emil I: 17UDES 03: 20VK 100.01 (P): 20Lowe: 22T26E5/Patriot: 20AMX M4 49/Liberte: 20112: 17Rhm. Skorpion: 17 Obj. 252U/Defender: 21 Strv S1: 20Lorr. 40t: 21Chrysler K GF: 20
  7. these are 9.19 so they don't work i'm afraid
  8. Sad to see nerf of best map in the game
  9. Not really, being bottom tier as a good player means you ease the life of your top tier players a lot so that's how it should go up downside is that if your top tiers don't know shit you have no solo carry potential so for me it's been roughly the same
  10. best tank is type 5 8k blocked isn't even hard when you have a serverpop that thinks gold is cheating
  11. top fucking kek at people thinking this is even half as cancer as the grille and strv both are
  12. its an overcorrection on WGs end and it might actually see some buffs soon to be a little bit more different expect better soft stats 113 has module issues that I didnt have in the 1-5 at all though
  13. It kinda depends on how urgent it is. I do recommend a 1070 still but they're out of stock everywhere or insanely expensive, might wanna consider looking around local stores that might have them lying around. A 1080TI is a very powerful card and will be a waste on a game like WoT for a very long time unless you plan on running 4K or widescreen 1440P which means the monitor upgrade to make the TI worthwhile is at least 500 EUR (this is for WoT, other games will benefit way more from that card even without that kind of screen size difference) I think getting a 1070 (if you can without a ridiculous price) and a more sophisticated monitor would be a better deal moneywise. 1080p (or 1440p) with 144Hz monitors (BenQ Zowie or Acer Predator) are decently priced and reviews are good. Personally I think 24" is the sweet spot for 1080p and 27" doesn't feel sharp enough. 1440p performs much better there. If the game is doing more than 60FPS and your screen is doing 60Hz it might try to display several frames at once and it looks like this: I only had that happen to me once in WoT due to rotating fast in sniper mode (game is pretty much hardcapped at 120 FPS unless you unlock it anyway so tearing shouldn't any real issue in the first place). An important thing that people seem to forget is that Hz and FPS are not really the same. Hz is the rate your monitor will refresh in per second and FPS is number of frames the software is processing per second, so you will notice a difference between running 60FPS/60Hz and 100FPS/60Hz because the software will animate smoother (basically reducing input lag) but it's to a certain degree and it's obviously not as "good" as 144Hz. 60Hz doesn't mean that you're hardcapped at 60FPS even though the monitor only refreshes 60 times per second with 1 frame per refresh due to this.
  14. 1060/1070 have decent money/performance values so there's always that. Now performance in WoT is pretty useless since the game is so poorly optimized you'll end up with more than "necessary" once the HD maps are released that actually might have some optimization. But consider that the game will be considerably heavier to run maxed out in probably less than a year due to the HD maps (they will only keep one render so all maps should turn HD) + physics with havok so you should probably upgrade with that in mind. I still recommend a 1070. I've scaled the resolution up 1.5x and it ran 4K maxed out on a 1080p screen at 60fps. Couldnt notice any difference forcing 1440p at Max while having 3 screens active with movies and other stuff compared to the native res either at 144Hz and stable 120 FPS Pick up a decent 1070, OC it and that should last you quite a while of maxed out WoT at 1440p
  15. Upload it to wotreplays or just use a filehost, then PM me the link or just post it here