Verified Tanker [SEA]
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by wasaabi_SEA

  1. This is the forum rule that applies: Additionally, excessively long forum signatures are not permitted. Signatures may not exceed two lines. If these limitations are exceeded, then the disruptive elements will be removed without explanation and the offending account may receive sanctions. Users are allowed to use images in your signatures, but their size must not exceed 468px×120px (length x width). The signatures can contain animation, but it should not be annoying. In my view if you can fit them on one line it is ok.
  2. You should be able to fit them side by side, give it a shot
  3. Time to start a Patreon account perhaps.
  4. That seems reasonable to restrict by IP so they can manage the load, can you ask Azure for a NATd address so it doesn't have to change?
  5. I'll go and look for them
  6. Middle position on Fisherman's Bay farming heavies moving into town. 3.8K damage, 1.8K spotting
  7. 4,200 spotting and got my first MOE on it.
  8. https://ritastatusreport.live/2018/03/03/dont-ask-questions-moderator-abuse-in-world-of-tanks-consoles-forums/#comment-58998
  9. There are two trainees and it's like they jump at shadows.
  10. On the CT server so probably not relevant, but felt good after a shitty day.
  11. Getting to Improved Equipment, 1 bond at a time
  12. I only act on JOCs reports when they make sense, just as I would for any player. Unfortunately for Germi JOCs reports make more sense than all of his posts.
  13. Has anyone got an idea of what drugs Germidor is smoking? They are certainly mind-altering stuff.
  14. The update is the list has now been created and shards have started to be credited but will be trickle fed to not exceed server loads. Some players have already reported receiving them.
  15. http://forum.worldoftanks.asia/index.php?/topic/77886-holiday-ops-xmas-gift-boxes-decorations/ Compensation of 1160 shards per box purchased, and all players get 5 free in game decoration boxes for the inconvenience.
  16. Thanks, I saw your link in Gen chat last night when I got back and gave him a 3D ban
  17. Agreed, but that included the protagonist, which is why the sperg on general chat. Completely predictable I have to say. Unfortunately most of the backwards views are almost exclusively in general chat, they are too afraid of the forums. I take it all the multiple posts of this on the forums was your mobile phone going nuts? I cleaned it up for you.
  18. Well, y'all didn't stop referring to an individual after being warned. On the other hand, an even better outcome was achieved.
  19. That seems about right, they would absolutely apply a concurrency factor to what they purchase which by rights should be averaged to the 95th percentile, but that is not likely to be anywhere near 1%. The retail business is so different to the commercial business. What this has ended up like is almost identical to HFC, which is a shared bandwidth model at the local level.
  20. Strange, I'm paying $109 for 100/40 on NBN FTTH so I can't believe Telstra is only making $9 on top. Who's your ISP? Earlier this year I was getting only 19Mbps so got Telstra on the phone and after some mumbo jumbo it magically went back up to normal at about 95Mbps. They admitted during the process that they would only take action if the performance dropped below 50% of the promised level. Latency is not mentioned on their PDS, so I guess they would investigate and have their own incident management on overloaded nodes, but there is no end to end performance promise anywhere in sight for consumer accounts.
  21. Sounds like they have no idea on what their latent capacity requirement is and aren't asking for enough.