Verified Tanker [EU]
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by nabucodonsor

  1. I find it funny when WG sats "we dont know what to do about tanks like the 110 and the t32, we know we have to fix them though". I agree and for staters give 220 standard pen on their 105 and 100 guns making a change that wont break the game but it will be better for who plays it? Then buff the handling of the t32 and the mobility on the 110? Also give a decent premium round on the american one? Why the fuck does the Caernavon get 220 pen but the t32 doesn't?
  2. Man this tank shows how stupid WG is. They already had a great sidescraping decently mobile superheavy: the IS4. Sure it needs a buff (or better the other tanks should be nerfed and balance around it) but it already does what the 705A does and even better. I guess because many already have an IS4 not many players would grind and throw away free xp for it.
  3. Nice stuff and nice marks!
  4. Wait a couple of patches when it will receive Stalin's magic touch.
  5. I have witnessed a player with 33% wr with a e25 in 85 games.... I honestly wanted to congratulate him. It must require some skill to lose this much.

    1. Show previous comments  2 more
    2. nabucodonsor


      True problem is he had 41% on other tanks with bigger sample size and an overall of 43%. And having 33% in a e25 is impressive. 

    3. StormCrowReaperManyHats


      It's still an outlier. My Type 59 had 38% at 180 games back when I was a 55%er. Statistics are hard yo

    4. Darvek


      @StormCrowReaperManyHats My favorite is my Nashorn vs. my JP IV. Nash: 1090 dpg, 1.5 kpg, 67% WR. JP IV: 1180 dpg, 1.9 kpg, 46% WR. Ground both lines around the same time (so in the same meta). Both turretless tier 6 TDs. Performed better in the JP IV (though well in both), but a 21% lower WR.

  6. Here all you need to know
  7. Fuck my clan if I manage to get a stable ping connetion i'll grind the credits to get the discounted t49. I MISS YOU BABY I'M SORRY!!!!!!

  8. I have been playing arty to get some missions done to get the tanks easier (and because my ping has been very bad lately). Dear lord it is not worth it. I can understand playing for mission, but playing it as your main class is just sad. After some games I feel dirty and even more bored than before. How can people play all those games and not get tired of it. It's so fucking boring. At this point it's better to quit and do something else. Hell get a hobby, do drugs anything is better than this.

    WG plz remove it not because it's bad for the game, but because it is bad for who plays it.

    1. Show previous comments  7 more
    2. PlanetaryGenocide


      when i have a bad game i play arty to make other people have bad games.

      recently i've had a huge hardon for splashing hot gold HE loads all over cute 268 v4 faces

      cancer killing cancer what's not to love

    3. nabucodonsor


      @Errants how can you enjoy it? I get so bored of just clicking left and right. If wanted to HE people to death I'd get back my t49 (which I will). 

      And another thing with artillery is that you can see how bad people are at playing this game. It's like watching a reality show on bad players.

    4. Errants


      I don't enjoy playing artillery. I enjoy shitting on other people's games.

  9. Only t49 gameplay is missing but guys the Derp is strong with Circon

    1. Deus__Ex__Machina
    2. nabucodonsor


      Yeah I laughed so hard at that one.

  10. FF and maybe camo. Maybe the Vstab one but it is very expensive. Oh and since we are at it the only improved equipment people should get are IVstab and IVents. The rest is garbage.
  11. Seriously players are so dumb in this game: I was top dmg even after I crushed the game and loaded in with less than half of my hp. Meanwhile other players did not even do a single hp of dmg. I cant say I carried but people are braindead. 


    1. DirtyACE7


      And just think, this is WG's actual target audience. The very same retards, degenerates, mouth-breathers, window-lickers that can't even do a single shot of damage whilst being top tier. This is who WG wants to tailor the game to.

    2. nabucodonsor


      Yep and instead of finding a way to teach them how to play they just buff random bullshit to OP levels and dumb down the game.

  12. Daki shows gameplay and review of all the tech trees with is buddy Dimitry. You should find here what tanks you should drive. PS: the sad part about this joke is that it is true.
  13. QB for not calling 268v4 broken. Oh in his opinion you should flank it.
  14. ISU 152 got "rebalanced" which many consider it a nerf.
  15. But they do not plan on nerfing Jageru's pen or alpha as they did on blitz. I'd love to have a shaved E5 but frankly I dont see it coming. Just like Leo handling buff.
  16. On Blitz Batchat gets better terrain resistance and 2,5 intraclip reload.

    1. leggasiini


      Batchat also has only a 3 shell clip and a lot worse alpha damage I think there.

      AFAIK Batchat was Batshit on Blitz so buff is reasonable

  17. Blitz has 15% rng on pen and other differences and considering how idiotic Murazor is nothing is certain.
  18. True but the SC gets some weakspots (tiny) on the turret. E5's is almost perfect without the cupola. And it would have a way better hull and decent mobility with a reasonable gun.

    ...... Is this what balance looks like in tank game?

    1. mati_14


      Blitz wants to make money by keeping their players playing, PC just wants you to buy the next bundle they'll put in the Premium Shop

    2. nabucodonsor


      I am starting to think I should move back to blitz.

    3. EndlessAgony


      We have a lot shittier economy, equipment system with wait times and really bad events tho. Also, quite a few anime tanks such as that SEA only Valkyria Chronicles Garbage for big WoT.

      We got a +/- 1 MM tho, to add to the stuff you count as pros.

      Also, more open maps in general aside from the last shitty one.


      Anyways, if you get into Blitz and are on EU, just PM me, I'll let you into my "clan which really isn't a clan" so you an get some discounts on consumables and stuff.


  20. With the cupola shaved it would be very good. The hull down capabilities would almost be better than a Super Conqueror. I doubt that Murazor is going to do so.
  21. When I discovered it's existence I was shocked. I always thought it was a meme running around.
  22. M103 is trash there is no reason to play it. It's a support tank that cant support and the only time it works is when people dont aim at "HIT ME" sign called turret. Hell an IS can overmatch the roof. A t49 with HEAT can pen it. It faces too much competition not only among the 120mm meta but the whole heavy meta. It's worse than an E75 (trading alpha/armour for some pw/t), worse than WZ/T10 (which have speed, alpha and even armour where it matters (see turret)). It fails as defensive tank (see Conqueror), it fails at bullying lower tiers (E75, 51, maybe 257 and VKB) and it fails as a support tank (Juanito and T10 are way better due to the alpha/mobility). As much as it pains me to say this the entire line is useless to grind and all tanks are bad except the immortal t29.
  23. I only watched Anfield's video on youtube and I can say Fisherman's bay 1-2 line is impossible to push from both sides. Maybe LTs could break a camp but the problem is north can camp with one Strv in A1 and never be spotted. Middle ridge is longer from north to south and with less cover so taking shots will be much harder whitout getting spotted. City stays the same. Arfield and Ensk look pretty much the same aka bad
  24. Have you seen the new maps? I hate to say this and I want to be really wrong but I think this game is almost done for. And I mean it. They have absolutely no clue of what they are doing. Really fuck Murazor&Co
  25. It's autopen for Heat. It negates the autobounce side and the front becomes super easy to pen. The T-10 was better. The funny thing is the IS cant pen it but the chinese IS2 can pen the side of with it's 250 heat. So yeah GJ to WG.