HairlesMonkyBoy

Show Off Your Triple Marks of Excellence

1,336 posts in this topic

17 minutes ago, Kolni said:

If you put APCR on 1 it's the standard ammo :doge: 

AP for arta :kappa:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, rojo180 said:

0mWH3RX.jpg

7pYzdfr.jpg

It was mildly disgusting spamming APCR out of this. :trump:

The very fact that it is better than some Tier 10 TDs makes the JT my personal favourite Tier 9. And APCR are cheap in it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, _Violence_ said:

The very fact that it is better than some Tier 10 TDs makes the JT my personal favourite Tier 9. And APCR are cheap in it.

I'm curious if the rebalanced Foch will actually be good next patch?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, rojo180 said:

I'm curious if the rebalanced Foch will actually be good next patch?

the 155 is op

FochB is annoying though, you have a large enough clip that it's worth keeping half clips but everytime you track someone you wish had them all ><

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally. 97 games. 1200 + 300 assisted. It's frickin hard when everybody faps in T67. 

7TqalGI.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OgT23xx.jpg

8k damage, 7.8k blocked. Bad pubbies are bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 09-08-2017 at 6:55 PM, SchnitzelTruck said:

OgT23xx.jpg

8k damage, 7.8k blocked. Bad pubbies are bad.

I wonder which is harder overall, considering req and how cancerous it might be to mark it, E3 or JP?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, CarbonWard said:

RgMRfQ7.png

NA first? :notlikethis:

I live fot the day when @CarbonWard will release videos/replays of his epic games. Especially for approved tanks like Skorp G.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/6/2017 at 2:14 AM, rojo180 said:

I'm curious if the rebalanced Foch will actually be good next patch?

Might be worse, but it can be more aggressive with the autoloader.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/17/2017 at 9:09 PM, CarbonWard said:

RgMRfQ7.png

NA first? :notlikethis:

Striker from Bulba did it a few days prior.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

All from today

e7zypeB.jpgaWwxXiI.jpg

hSUZGFY.jpg

9HVCAeK.jpg

Friggin bitch tanks are horrible for winning.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wondering if 5A or 907 is harder atm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Kolni said:

wondering if 5A or 907 is harder atm

If I had a 907 I'd let you know. Mark on this was around 5.5k to not move. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Rspctd said:

If I had a 907 I'd let you know. Mark on this was around 5.5k to not move. 

Yeah reqs are the same-ish, the difficulty level is determined by how good the tank is

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Kolni said:

Yeah reqs are the same-ish, the difficulty level is determined by how good the tank is

907 probably would be easier then. The 5A is good but you can get royally fucked with ammo racks and bot idiots yolo'ing you. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I literally had to stick above 3.5K damage. I started playing this thing 2 years ago and I failed my way through 300 odd battles stuck at borderline 90%, here today after several WoT client updates it still has absurdly high damage standards. Thanks to the recent buffs for both T-44s it opens up a clearer path to the final battle.

pNuGuU3.jpg

YzJcRuf.jpg

Now no longer having nightmares of remaining at 90% for an unsellable tank.

pi1CALS.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My first Tier 10 3 marks. Enjoyed the fact that it had -4 degrees of depression and I had to expose my lower hull 99% of the time. Loved it. But Foch is more difficult, as being the worst Tier 9 TD in the game.

8Y5UFf9.jpg

giT5V5N.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.