Gadgets & Technology
Sign in to follow this
Followers
0
A place to yell at each other about smartphone brands.
33 topics in this forum
-
- 12 replies
- 1,077 views
-
- 0 replies
- 522 views
-
- 29 replies
- 1,812 views
-
- 6 replies
- 3,734 views
-
- 64 replies
- 3,790 views
-
- 10 replies
- 956 views
-
- 40 replies
- 2,859 views
-
- 12 replies
- 1,308 views
-
- 56 replies
- 3,536 views
-
- 13 replies
- 1,294 views
-
- 14 replies
- 1,228 views
-
- 11 replies
- 1,010 views
-
- 62 replies
- 4,108 views
-
- 24 replies
- 1,431 views
-
- 31 replies
- 2,886 views
-
- 55 replies
- 8,236 views
-
- 8 replies
- 1,211 views
-
- 8 replies
- 1,078 views
-
- 35 replies
- 2,942 views
-
- 2 replies
- 845 views
-
- 17 replies
- 1,273 views
-
- 5 replies
- 1,014 views
-
- 44 replies
- 2,402 views
-
- 4 replies
- 1,150 views
-
- 1 reply
- 844 views
Sign in to follow this
Followers
0
-
Latest Articles
-
Topics
-
-
Recent Status Updates
-
Just had a 0 - 15 game where every single one of my team was <50% w/r. The botting in this game is systemic and ridiculous.
-
I have some thoughts about winning/losing. It originates from Chess, been playing a lot lately. A game mostly, about precision than anything else. In Chess, you are neither winning or losing until a mistake is made. The mistakee is the loser, but the opponent doesn't win. He loses, but the opponent doesn't actually win. He just capitalises on a mistake. There is no RNG there, so precision is what matters. Higher precision means playing better.
WoT has RNG, but the same thing applies. You are in limbo until a mistake is made. How quick you are at spotting them is what makes a good player. A good example is the 7v7 Ruinberg defense. This was so hard to win as an attacker as you can hold everything fairly easily. Same as GMs in Chess - everything holds and results in a draw.
What about thinking the other way? That you are always winning until you make a mistake? I think it results in super heavy aggression. These are the types of people that fight their way to the top. And the other side - where I am. Passive approach - always in limbo until something shifts the balance in either favour. That's about precision. The former is about mechanics. Obviously they blend, but I think it's interesting to at least entertain the idea that my way of play is flawed, even if it ranked number one at one point.
I basically never take unnecessary trades in Chess to try and keep the board as complicated for as long as possible, mistakes are easier to make there. In WoT - mistakes happen every second but you physically cannot move to capitalise in time on all of them. I'm just curious if there's a method of being there for more of them. So I'm going to play like an asshat to push that limit and try to improve it (WoT). I want ways to push the limits and this is an idea I want to explore..
No Recent Status Updates -
.gif.836e07170550a946ba799a2e7540a9d6.thumb.gif.d9aaff08d3c94f9c63f6f0443bca7976.gif)
