Jump to content


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 08/17/2019 in all areas

  1. 8 points
    Seriously though I and Im pretty sure almost no one here has any real issues with you We just want to know what the hell is up with the 0 key, and the more you completely avoid it the more curious and more meme prone we get over it. Theres literally nothing wrong with most of what you post, no more than anyone else here. Its just the damn 0 key man and I dont know why you are so adament on avoiding just telling us whats up with that to the point where you literally type out one hundred over 100 or even 1OO and go and re edit the Os to posts I edited them to be 0s lol.
  2. 8 points
  3. 6 points
    why yes I can....and did.
  4. 6 points
  5. 5 points
    what the fuck is going on in this thread. I don't even know who to mod and who to call an idiot.
  6. 5 points
    It's like oicraftian stole all his 0s and he's really butthurt about it.
  7. 5 points
    This got to me eventually too. WG's map design philosophy changed (or just became more apparent) in 2014 or so to accommodate the idea that every class should have one specific flank on the map. It's so boring, and once WG finished their map transition with 1.0, all the fun was sucked out of the game for me. I was tired of doing the same thing every single game because it was so optimal that I might as well not have clicked battle if I tried otherwise. I could go on forever about everything that went wrong, but at the end of the day it's just Wargaming's soulless take on game design that finally did the game in. They've been trying to squeeze the game dry since the day it released, but at least for those first few years they didn't know how. It just took them a few more years to implement everything on their checklist.
  8. 4 points

    Broken armoured car dilemma.

    I got him, dont worry.
  9. 4 points

    The Idiot's Guide to Frontlines

    I posted this on the official forums in the hope of reaching as many pubbies as possible, and robo suggested on Discord that I cross-post it here. Not expecting it to be news to longstanding Labbers, but if it helps someone... Episode 7 is upon us, and yet again we're plagued with people who seem to want to play Frontlines in the most self-defeating way possible and ruin the mode for everyone else, so here's the Idiot's Guide to Frontlines. Let's establish the victory conditions, and it's not what you'd expect: picking up a win or a loss is barely relevant. You'll still be making credits hand over fist either way. What you want whether you're attacking or defending is for all bases to be captured during the course of the game and to run the clock out blowing up each other's tanks. That means that everyone has the most possible time to farm rank, and you want to farm rank because one game at General is worth more than 2 games at Captain, 3 games at Lieutenant or 8 games at Sergeant (and that's just in terms of Frontline progress, you also get the Battle XP multiplier too). If you're attacking, stop trying to take out the objectives. All that achieves is ending the game early and denies you and everyone else on both teams rank and Frontlines XP. Focus on capping all 6 bases then use the time you've built up to kill enemy tanks. If you're defending and the clock is running out, allow the other team to cap and prolong the game. You don't want too much time on the clock because uninformed players will rush to hit the objectives instead of capping bases, but conversely you don't want it to come down to the wire and the attackers be prevented from capping and adding time to the clock. Finally, the best way to gain rank is capping/defending. This makes every game as a defender a balancing act, because you want to be doing the majority of your damage in and around the cap circles, but not when the clock is low because that might lead to an early win/loss. It's unfortunate that any of this needs to be said, but it's a consequence of Frontlines being a fundamentally broken game mode where the incentives don't align with the victory conditions.
  10. 3 points
  11. 3 points
    I am prepared to give you [Long pause for suspense] My account in exchange for info regarding your 0 key
  12. 3 points

    What did change past 2 years?

    Under WoT timelines, "Just around the corner" means 2 years and "imminent" means at least 6 months
  13. 3 points
    Dont listen to them they dont mean any harm. And quite frankly you are one of the few who keeps this forum active. Dont let them push you down. They are just joking, although i guess they really want to know why you type the way you do. It is sad to say but unfortunately this game has broken our will to talk about it, so many would rather make fun of you than seriously discuss about the many game's flaws.
  14. 3 points
    You would rather exile yourself than to explain what's wrong with your 0 key?
  15. 3 points
    This is exactly how I feel and yes fuck the 1.0 map changes. Every previously usable area is now covered by some shitty TD hill or bush that's so obvious, yet you have no choice. I despise probably 97% of the maps in the game and it's probably my biggest problem with the game. All the other shit aside, if I had an option on where to actually go I would enjoy the game 10x more.
  16. 3 points

    Back when I said the IS-3 wasn't OP.

    Can you NOT drag official forum garbage back here please?
  17. 3 points

    WG makes decisions to infuriate people

    It's T-one-hundred-and-three to you. Stop being autistic and explain what's wrong with your 0 key.
  18. 3 points


    @A_Chodeful TBH i love these occasional posts simply because of their ability to bring out so many of the dead members, if even for a single moment.
  19. 3 points
    The lengths you go through just to avoid explaining what's wrong with your 0 key is intriguing.
  20. 3 points


    yeah but i have pretty much all your dpgs beat so who's really the champ here
  21. 2 points
    Or until he explains what's wrong with his 0 key and why can't he use it.
  22. 2 points
    Ok for a start, there is a literal 0% chance Never intentionally removed the active user list. He probably updated the software and it defaulted to off and he didnt notice it or something. Second, as Enroh said, I cant RO dirizon because he hasnt done anything toxic, and if you think I should RO everyone who has been toxic to him, Id be ROing pretty much every single active user on the damn forum. I have already modded one person who was being directly insulting to him after they were told to stop. But the fact of the matter is he turned a tiny issue that requires a stupidly simple answer into a giant meme purely on his blatent refusal to answer it, and as I mentioned before, attempts to avoid it, so its kind of on him at the moment.
  23. 2 points
    The stance is simply, say something so we can all move on. I am not going to RO him because he is not toxic. At all. I am merely trying to find a middle ground to appease all. Go have some breakfast (its 8am here) and relax. I think you are taking this way too seriously. We are all Carbon and Carbon is all of us. Surely you must know this.
  24. 2 points
    changed profile pic to reflect my wot status now that carbon's gone
  25. 2 points
    Drew this on my phone w/stylus during the more boring times at work the past couple of days Look ma, new content in the T49 thread!
  26. 2 points
    Can we change the @Dirizon to @Diriz0n rather than kick him out?
  27. 2 points
    Call it whatever you like, but are you going to explain what's wrong with your 0 key?
  28. 2 points
    @Oicraftian Don't quote me you bastard. I didn't want to be raised from the dead just to read this
  29. 2 points
    I know it's late. But I'm happy this thread continued for as long as it did. My long departure from it was probably not the best thing. However I had my reasons. I want to say congratulations to Hibachi and everyone else who has really been able to make use of it. Thank you for participating.
  30. 2 points

    WoT matchmaker conspiracy theory

    Yes WG proposed multiple versions of the MM in the patent, and actually if you read it, the 'manipulation' bit that all the tinfoil hat people jump on is very very minor, its a proposal to basically give you slightly easier MM if you have lost a lot or harder MM if you have won a lot in a row. Which is actually the opposite of what rigged-MM complainers claim is happening, they claim WG is making them lose and they have all these loss streaks, but actually according to the patent the game should be giving them easier MM if they are having loss streaks, but clearly isn't. The majority of the patent talks about vehicle weighting and tiers and using that to create challenges and easier times for players, which is pretty obvious, get top tier stomp people, get bottom tier get stomped by people, which creates enough replayability and 'challenge' on its own. I'd also presume the guy worked at WG NA yeh? Even if that was true, what does NA know about the intricate details of how the game works, that is all done in Minsk, none of the regional offices deal with development so how would he know anyway, he was likely some community manager or something. As said above we have people who have pushed like 70% solo win rates and have had 20 plus game win streaks, so it honestly makes nonsense of claims its trying to normalise win rates.
  31. 2 points
    Just 3 marked my first ever tank, the Charioteer. Can we get a moment of silence to mourn all the tier 6 and 7 tanks that ate premium HESH rounds and allowed me to accomplish this? http://wotreplays.eu/site/5008837#highway-echo9835-charioteer
  32. 2 points
    speaking of WOWP I need to log back into that so I can buy more WoT premium lmao
  33. 2 points
    WTF did I just waste 3 minutes of my life reading? If you are going to self-necro stupid shit from 2016, at least do it ironically and try to entertain us a little.
  34. 2 points

    Back when I said the IS-3 wasn't OP.

    "You weren't downvoted for saying the IS-3 isn't OP, those were from you saying the KV-5 and WZ-111 had more armor." That makes sense.
  35. 2 points
    So, are we speaking with The English German, or is this Katze? You attempt to necro a topic from 3 years ago, and it just so happens your "friend" made this thread: http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/610612-when-you-dare-to-disagree-with-purple-players-on-the-wotlab-forums/ You weren't downvoted for saying the IS-3 isn't OP, those were from you saying the KV-5 and WZ-111 had more armor. And here, have some more downvotes for making this idiotic thread, which should've been deleted when you were still typing it up.
  36. 2 points

    FL Tiers

    What's wrong with your 0 key? I think you left out a bunch of zeroes.
  37. 2 points


    The other night I woke up around 4am and thought I’d have to get up to take a leak. But then I did a fart that had enough volume to take the pressure down. So I went back to sleep.
  38. 2 points


    I got that trex bod, squat 300 bench 150 ohbtw are you dk from Tokyo Drift by any chance?
  39. 2 points


    Oh hey, I weight 93kg too, but almost none of it is muscle
  40. 2 points
    Here is a free zero, in case he might need one:
  41. 2 points


    its honestly quite hard trying to decipher what OP wants. As someone who has put in the last 10 months into muay thai it honestly seems like he is your average gym shitter who grew muscles and gained a superego to fit. Here is the issue with martial arts. Any martial artist worth its Asian salt takes fucking years to get proficient in (and wrestling etc). pick what you want to do. It isnt fucking pixel shitter gamer crap and you cant apply such a dumbfuck ego to any of it. whatever kind of idea you have about martial arts you should have honestly started before you started lifting (lifting is great but you need many other core strength skills as well in any martial arts profession) and sparring takes years to perfect and train in. my coach is still shitting on guys who are bulk AF over basic thing and i have trained with them and they could snap my spine in a heartbeat. TBH gains before going into martial arts isnt a bad idea but remove any semblance of an ego you had because you will get shit on for a long time.
  42. 2 points


    Went from 92 kg to 77 kg while doing a through hike, came back and even after atrophy in my upper body, can pull just as hard and have been able to hit 7a climbs that before were the edge of my ability, just two days after being back, the goal today is to hit 7b, and within the next two or three months start scratching into 7c/7c+. Bonus is I went from 9% BF to about 3%.
  43. 1 point

    Steps to fix Defender.

    According to tanks.gg I found 30mm roof, so, yeah, tinfoil
  44. 1 point
    The lower front armour is weaker than people expect. It is alot like VK1(P) the lower armour isn't very strong. Chrysler for instance has a stronger lower front. This tank is okay. It is not good, like a Liberte. But on the other side, it is not bad, like a Tiger ll. The armour is mostly over estimated, but still workable. Like an E-Hundo, it is has armour yes, but also has clay feet. ************ Posted May 1 I agree on Tiger I Tbh I'd rather have the 900 hp engine that would light itself on fire break at 700 hp IRL than a bullshit turret roof buff. New turret research can replace Tiger II's 105/52 gun research. Buff the gun bloom on movement to keep the handling on par. Turret frontal should not hit 220. About 200 to stop tier 6/7 gold is more than enough. One issue here is the cheeks creating a large weakpoint, 80mm --> 100mm will stop them from being pierced, without pushing the turret sides overboard. Additionally, this reinforces a good habit; shooting vertical armor. So it is a healthy armor change. "Do not shoot cheeks dumbfuck" signal. Damage per minute I do not think should be a focus. Simply, improving the gun handling My reasoning is this: Tiger I has the ability to kill an enemy tank in roughly 6 shots. Tiger II has the ability to kill equal tier enemy tank in roughly 4.5 shots. So, if it has high DPM, it is DPM creep. To make it a 'different' tank than the Tiger I, making it more 'accurate' when moving, as well as improving mobility, I think is the correct path. Its armor will benefit from the 'reduced exposure' kind (from less aiming), and it combines well with a 1000 m/s AP shell velocity. - { Getting onto topic } - In my baddie trash opinion. This is retarded. The armor is, as everyone has mentioned, very good, too good actually. Typical WarGay will give it no weakspots cuz WarGay. 0.19/0.19/0.15 bloom is ridiculous for a heavy tank, 2.59 second aimtime and 0.374 acc... 380 viewrange cuz bunkers should have decent VR too right? But of course! 226 AP pen, 490 alpha, 920 m/s shell velocity, 1858 DPM, gotta have that TD gun with average tier 8 DPM. And of course, non omega bad mobility. Why after all this time.... Not just make it a tier 9 CW tank? ************ I want to elaborate how stupid this post is. This tank sure, can slap people for almost five-hundred damage, okay. It also is a size of a house, has no gun depression, has a front engine that gets damaged every front pen.....with a lower front weaker than Chrysler. Hull body roof is only fourty, gets over-match. Turret roof only fourty, slapped by over-match. Really the armour is just intimidating to those who don't know it yet. It has bad DPM (compared to alpha tanks like Prototyp, 252Y, IS3) bad soft gun control like T34Hvy, the view range is lower than expected, HP is lower than expected.....the tank is an alpha gimmick, but other than that its lucky if par. It is better than Brecher, sure but piece of shit like 112 is better than Brecher. Apparently though, this slavic pro rusky baboon, thinks that it is alright to have have an IS7 in tier 8, with a toned down obj 26O gun, with IS4 side armour, and an obj 257 side shot trap. Because fuck sakes, there is no problem at all with 252Y, when the front 2/3rd of the tank is even immune to prem HEAT from obj 416. Seriously, look at it: Thats 317 pen HEAT, 2/3rd of the tank is no hit red. GG Who the fuck thought that was great, to add into tier 8? obj 252 is still one of the, if not the most, broken things this game still has, and unlike obj 268 V4, won't be changed because WG hates back tracking prem tanks. Then defender has awesome alpha, awesome pen, still the same DPM of an IS3, almost as quick, almost as sleek and small.....wait its a super heavy that is also reasonably small?.......This baboon goes on to say five hundred dmg shots are op, with that velocity.....then omits the Defender thats been here for 2 fucking years, with just fifty less alpha for more than one hundred more DPM, better gun depression, better gun soft stats, better armour, better mobility, less weak spots, smaller size, more camo....Defenders prominent weakspots, the cupolas are quite small, and the lower hull is the strength of IS7s, AKA Tiger ll upper hull. Nice. Like, I don't care if you are Russian. But you have been poisoned to the point of blind nationalism, you are a bigot, that shares WGs malice to spread this shit within an online game. This is the 21st century you boob. It is because of you, your people, your kind, that tanks like obj 9O7A, 26O exist, or WG thought it was fine to release obj 268 V 4. And for 6 months, CW teams were fielding 6-9 268 V4s. It is not my place to insult you, you are just being a blind, imbecilic, unreasonable clot. Too lazy to read? I just ground out front lines an entire week, with tanks like panther 88. 2O3mm AP pen, enough for VK75 lower front, even at ten degree list, two-hundred m away. Try penetrating defender like that. AKA, bounce all the time and cry in the corner while it slams into you for over four hundred, or just equip prem rounds before hand, to shoot its --weakspot--
  45. 1 point

    The Idiot's Guide to Frontlines

    fucking feelsbad you can't even TK arty by blocking their barrels anymore fuck this game so much seriously
  46. 1 point
    I don't hate him i just want to know what the fuck is wrong with him.
  47. 1 point
    Would it be ok if you two just choose one thread to do this in?
  48. 1 point
    Fuck me that was long. But that is some seriously good content, thanks Kolni, excellent article. I'm with Haswell, someone needs to sticky this. I will probably read it a hundred times
  49. 1 point

    Type 4 Chi-To

    This tank feels like a turreted TD like the AC4, Strv 74 or M36 to me. Gun is crazy good for it's tier and has -10 depression. Doesn't need to load gold with the penetration. It really reminds me of the original STA-2 when it came out, being a sort of turreted TD/Medium Hybrid with meh mobility. The tank is only slightly bigger than an STA-2 so camo isnt a huge problem, you just have to hide your hull and ridge snipe, and always keep everyone at arms length, like a British tank. Loader and Ammorack tend to take the hits.
  50. 1 point

    Drawing Contest

  • Create New...