Leaderboard

hardest MoE I've done so far tbh

I bought a new car yesterday. It wasn't a Volvo! It was the 2nd best- a Toyota Avensis*! Got a really fucking sweet deal on it, it's previously owned by a couple in their 50s that has taken literally every single recommended service on it- and then some. And they only used it for longer drives as they live 20 metres from the store and he takes the bus to work. And I got it really cheap because they already got a newer Toyota and needed the parking space lol.

Take a short break everyone I'll post the properly updated list after this. No one post until I update THIS post. UPDATED WITH CURRENT RANKINGS (we got so shit that even Rexxie had the wrong figures). I calculated all of this by manually tracking each upvote and each downvote down all of the posts. T-34-2 - 20 110 - 20 TVP VTU - 2 AMX AC 48 - 11 AMX 50 100 - 21 Rhm B WT - 20 Jagdpanther II - 26 Ferdinand - 20 VK 45.02A - 14 Tiger II - 22 Panther II - 14 Indien Panzer - 20 STA-1 - 20 O-Ho - 21 Centurion I - 8 AT-15 - 20 Caernarvon - 14 T69 - 21

One "o" for each weakspot? c:

My first ever Pool's medal and I am super happy about it.

Finally had a little time to play again. Why did I do this -_-

fuck swamp in general

This thread is like a third world election =)

My name's Khul, I have the day off work, & I'm here to tell you about Naval Warfare Simulations' Rule The Waves, 'cos I have no real life. I'm basically a wannabe grognard, a neophyte rivet-counter, a hipster wargamer. I like the first two Total War games 'cos they feel tactically "right", but hate everything since MTW1. Incredibly detailed damage/armour/ballistics models get me kinda hard, but I've always been scared of hexes & simply don't have the patience for Panzer General & its ilk. I like the idea of manning the pumps (hur-hur-hur-hur) & agonising for hours

Totally worth the -700k credits and the many near-tilt experiences ~5000 dpg over 21 games to go from ~87% to 95% only 57% winrate for the session though FeelsBadMan

Of course life isn't fair, otherwise you would have deserved all the bad shit that has happened to you.

Swamp led to a lot of draws before, but that would actually be refreshing with the current 3-minute steamroll meta.

Researched: M46 Patton researched. Undistributed experience spent: 174690. Free Experience spent: 0.

Fuck me in the ass without a condom, this is amazing

https://ritastatusreport.live/ WOT500KYOUTUBE Note: The bonus code gives Personal Reserves (Large, Medium and Small). Wow, kind lame 2 x +25 XP for 1 Hr 1 x +200 Crew XP for 1 hr

welcome to EU

Jesus christ.

http://goo.gl/forms/oPmuntWQ7oP2Xicz1 One a scale of 1 to 5, rate these tier 8 WOT tanks! When comparing, compare them to their fellow tier 8 tanks and how they might handle certain match-ups (IE Light Tanks have tier 9 matchmaking, will almost never see just tier 8 tanks) No premium tanks nor arty will be listed. And after discussion on WOTLabs, we will not include Light Tanks either, as they have a far different Match Maker. A response for each question is required PLEASE NOTE: AVERAGE IS A THREE (3). 1 - Worst tank for its class and tier (IE T28) 2 - Below average tan

Hello all, I've been playing for a little over 3 years and have just over 15k battles. It took me about 9k to settle down and really try to figure out how to play different tanks. I would usually just rush in and try to brawl regardless of what I was driving. Needless to say, it didn't get me anywhere in a hurry except a blown up tank. I started watching Youtube videos (mainly QuickyBaby, Jingles, and DezGames) and started to see how they played. I've been in a couple clans, but I'm in the military with a wife and kids, so I've never been one to platoon much, because when I'm on I li

For Great Ryukyu!~

T-34-2 - 20 110 - 20 AMX 50 100 - 23 Rhm B WT - 21 Jagdpanther II - 25 Ferdinand - 20 VK 45.02A - 12 Tiger II - 23 Panther II - 5 Indien Panzer - 17 STA-1 - 21 O-Ho - 21 Centurion I - 0 - Die you piece of trash. This tank has always been bad. Lots of module damage, relatively slow, weak DPM, basically relegated to a mid range sniper tank and not even great at that. I actually prefer the Caern over this turd. AT-15 - 20 Caernarvon - 5 Charioteer - 17 T69 - 18 Pershing - 26 T32 - 28 - Upvoting this instead because we already know IS-3 is going to win. T32 has beau

Fixed list. Added conjay's votes (paste, don't quote) and changed shutupshake's Centurion vote from -1 to -3. T-34-2 - 20110 - 20AMX 50 100 - 23Rhm B WT - 20Jagdpanther II - 25Ferdinand - 20VK 45.02A - 15Tiger II - 23Panther II - 5Indien Panzer - 14STA-1 - 21O-Ho - 21Centurion I - 3AT-15 - 20Caernarvon - 5Charioteer - 17T69 - 18Pershing - 26T32 - 27ISU-152 - 20SU-101 - 17Obj416 - 25T-44 - 20IS-3 - 35KV-4 - 21

wew lad mad chirps

Only problem you're gonna bump into tier 5 are mediums. You either have to roll with derps or with pew-pew guns. But I do recommend T-34 in that case, since T-34-85 is so good that you'll love it to bits.

Inb4 IS3 sits sideways and bounces APCR with its sides while sniping the conq cupola.

Derp guns are large caliber, slow firing, inaccurate guns that generally use HE ammunition and tend to have HEAT as premium ammo. Penetration is low, damage is high, accuracy and aiming time suck. The IS is now tier 7 and its 122mm is not a derp gun, just a standard 122mm. The 122mm on the KV-1S, however, is an example of a derp gun, just like the 105mm on the Sherman/Hetzer/Pz IV H. RU = glorious RUssian tanks KOMRAD pewpew = low alpha damage guns with high rate-of-fire. Examples: US 57mm, Russian 57mm, British 40mm, British 77mm

There are good tanks and not so good ones, the XP research costs depend on tier, not on the "quality" of the tank. WG doesn't make shit tanks intentionally, they just suck at balancing tanks and old vehicles get powercreeped by new ones. The Sherman leads to the US medium line which is one of the best lines in the game, there is not a single bad tank in it. They are built around excellent gun depression (-10 degrees) allowing you to abuse hills, they have great view range from tier 7 onwards, and have somewhat less accurate but very quick aiming guns. The M3 Lee at tier 4 may cause you so

KV-1 >>> Churchill I The only redeeming feature of the Churchill is the gun. Apart from that, mobility is awful, armor is crap, and the rest of the line is also very painful until the tier 9 Conqueror. By contrast, the KV-1 offers three equally viable and solid gun choices, great progression opportunities towards the IS-7 or IS-4 (you can also get KV-2 for lols), and the best armor layout at tier 5. It's an excellent tutorial tank. T-34/Sherman are excellent for learning medium gameplay and both lead to great medium lines. The T1 Heavy is trickier to play, but I guess you co

Thats how WG MM works

You sir, have no soul

Checkit: http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/05/asus-avalon-specs-modular-pc/ A little fruity but not too bad. But wait till you see this... http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/05/msi-hp-zotac-backpack-vr-pc-details-specs-price-release-date/ I don't know about you, but I certainly wouldn't feel safe wondering around with that unlicensed nuclear particle accelerator strapped to my back ;-)

Is fucking fun and I'm spamming this more than tanks every day now.

O-Ho will win

Fixing the derail: Can you spare a few minutes to talk about our lord savior emu87?

You're all laughing at the backpack PC now but just wait until VR really takes off

Its really not good for the long term health of the game when new players just starting the game have to immediately go through the worst vehicles that the game has to offer. I'm going to hazard a guess that this somehow hasn't done WG any favors for new player retention.

Ok, I've got nearly enough material together to launch WN9, but I need to make final decisions on a couple of aesthetic questions. Please read the explanations before answering the poll. Numerical range The reason for choosing ~400 for purple (currently 420) is that it's humanly impossible to sustain >3 digits over more than a handful of battles, which makes it easier to arrange a signature for recent or account WN9. 4000 is a similar option for 4 digits, while 2500 is closer to the WN8 scale. However, WN9 is contribution-linear and WN8 isn't, so the scales can only be equal at o

*donger intensifies* that guy's potato, just use as meatshield and farm the free dmgz

F

Well, in real life the IS-3 didn't have the BL-9 and a turret made of Stalinium.

"World of SPG's" very funny japan (near the blonde-ish girl with the cat ears)

Lian Li master race, aluminum cases beat steel and plastic boxes any day.

fucking shit meme 0/10 chenholes

Along with that, keep in mind the flexibility that training them into a large tree and line can bring. Say you put them in the 50/51 and then it gets nerfed into the ground - suddenly that crew is useless. Training them into the Russian, American, or German lines net you the most choices for future retrains.

There was when I grew up on the game, literally most cancer change was when they removed the dashes. E 100 and E 50 look so gross compared to the E-100 and E-50

2 weeks in-review. Random FCM:

Well, the underlying principle of WoT's matchmaking is to avoid skill-based MM by reducing personal influence instead. That list is a bit off: +/-2 MM on tiers 5-8 is very close to neutral for personal influence, while premium ammo (for credits) is actually positive because successful players can afford to fire more of it. Limited tank type balance does slightly reduce personal influence, but I'm not sure that's the primary intention. Tank tiers are only misbalanced due to incompetence. The primary mechanisms for reducing personal influence in WoT are pretty simple: 15v15 battles.