Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/23/2017 in all areas

  1. 4 points
    Finally get a spare moment to chat only to discover that chat is kill 7
  2. 4 points
    The chieftain is too historical for WG to bring back, plus it has weak spots in the form of its hull, both of which go against WGs balance policy.
  3. 3 points
    So after buying the GTX 1080, I've now bought Battlefield 1, Overwatch and GTA V. Rip money, having a job is dank and FeelsAmazingMan not having a trash PC.
  4. 3 points
    This guy: https://clips.twitch.tv/ConfidentGoodCookieDxCat
  5. 3 points
    OperatorError

    Chrysler K GF

    Fuckoff WarGaming.
  6. 2 points
    An article worth reading. https://ritastatusreport.live/2017/05/23/the-chrysler-k-in-the-bigger-picture/
  7. 2 points
    This morning in the WG EU offices: WG_EU_Community_Manager: I think we have this under control. At the very least it can't get any worse then it already is. This morning in the NA offices: WG_NA_Community_Manager: *walks in, sees that EU is resolving their problem, decides that this just won't stand* HOLD MAH BEEEER!!!!!!!!!! Several hours later at the EU offices: Jingles: I'm out, bro! Random less important CC: Me to! WG_EU_Community_Manager: FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK.
  8. 2 points
    Its not so awful anymore. https://www.mediafire.com/?dbyxq2bja5n4ats Type 62, averages right around 2k dpg for 40ish battles. It used to be bad, then it was good, then it was awful, and now its pretty good again, except that terrible HEAT shell cost that just needs to be brought down from 12g/4800silver to what? 8? 9? So that even when you pen your gold shells you aren't losing credits. Its not like the 62 makes massive profits anyhow right? Oh and a bonus Lakeville domination from Friday http://wotreplays.com/site/3603139#lakeville-crabeatoff-type_62
  9. 2 points
    That would be a group, mensch = person, menschen = group of people Not my fault english has so many usefull words, yet at the same time lacks many usefull words In regards to the OT part: This is a forum about world of tanks, Sir foch streams world of tanks, talking about an OP / badly balanced premium tank, which will influence our world of tanks games. Meanwhile a world of tanks forumtard admin goes full retard on said world of tanks streamer, leading to a small ``shit``storm. Did i mention this was a forum about world of tanks and that we discus world of tanks topic(s?)
  10. 2 points
  11. 2 points
    Fuck arty Wargaming
  12. 1 point
    Sorry I was in a hurry and wanted to respond fast. No problems with my English, sometimes I just write too fast. English is my main language in work and understanding what people are trying to communicate is basically my life as I'm a movie buyer and most acquisitions are based off scripts. Sorry about the messy post. I'm on a trade event right now so a mix of hangover, low amount sleep and spare time is not working well for me. Now to get to your point. " I believe we should trust that WG's grounds for removal of the video was being offensive to WG employeeThat was what WG said about their own logic and I would assume that a person can explain their logic behind an action, thus why I believe we should trust that WG's grounds for removal of the video was being offensive to WG employees" - This is the same reasoning from the first post. I understood it well. You basically say that we should trust WG's explanation if they say thing A was what caused them to take action. The thing is they can lie. Given that previously I worked in PR and I get info how my and other companies handle PR lying is OBVIOUSLY big part of your public relations. What I AM saying is we should not trust WG's explanation for their logic behind the whole move against Foch. The move might have as well been motivated by the need to censor him but OBVIOUSLY they can't say "hey guys we wanted to censor foch because his video was negative about our new product". This is exactly why you can't trust their official statements. Especially since at the same time they went after another contributor for a different video which may not be a coincidence and may indicate a change of politics regarding youtubers/contributors. It is a real possibility given that contributors have been recently more critical of War Gaming than usual and even QB gave them some flak for t10 light tank nerfs. I've worked under bosses who in similar situations would go after censorship and then deny it. So my experience tells me it is entirely possible they are lying. Also WG called Foch Homophobic on Kotaku. You really want to trust them when they do shit like that? You look at this only from one angle. Trier 8 tanks can see 5 different triers of tanks 6,7,8,9 and 10. OP premiums are not a big problem for only 2 out of 5 of those triers. Also even as top trier if enemy bottom trier tanks are OP and yours are shit given same skill level it may still mean a loss if the teams are equally balanced on high triers. It's a smaller problem but in the long run it has an influence on the game.
  13. 1 point
    Say what you want but Foch has brought so much entertainment to the table
  14. 1 point
    Oh shit!! Its going down!
  15. 1 point
    C A L C U L A T E D https://clips.twitch.tv/ResilientAbstruseParrotBudStar?tt_medium=clips_api&tt_content=url
  16. 1 point
    nabucodonsor

    Chrysler K GF

    U must not believe in Stalin enough if you aim in a russian tank. Shame on you
  17. 1 point
    Let's review some recent WG balancing... Teir X lights: The Defender: Oh, and of course, the WannaCrySler K:
  18. 1 point
    garryallen

    Chrysler K GF

    I think it was foch in his obj 252u review who said it might not be worth buying because wg are just going to release even moar opie crud
  19. 1 point
    Raj

    What are an M48A1's weakspots?

    is M60 number one?
  20. 1 point
    Lemme try it..."I suck!" Okay, so I'm a better player now, right? Darn...didn't work.
  21. 1 point
    Vettish

    Post patch thoughts

    I was just in a game with my Leo. I got shot at three times by one arty and none of them hit me, just all near misses. Nothing else hit me the whole game. In those three near misses that pos motherfucker killed me. Arty is just as bad if not worse than it ever was, just in a different way. Maybe in heavy tanks its a little better but tanks with little to no armor its much worse. Fuck arty. If any of you here enjoy playing arty then fuck you. Just sayin'
  22. 1 point
    Regardless of game longevity, I think we can all agree that these premiums detract from game health and balance. Whether the game dies in 3 months or 3 years, it doesn't really matter, especially if it isn't enjoyable to play because of the new monetization model.
  23. 1 point
    CarbonWard

    opinions on sirfoch being censored?

    Poke the bear, surprised when bear bites back. Accuse WG of being dirty fucking money grabbing pieces of shits, surprised when WG does exactly what a money grabbing piece of shit does and DMCA strikes you. Srsly?
  24. 1 point
    Ruuhkis

    T95 - The Brick of Tier 9

    What crewskills do you recommend to this thing? Just started grinding towards E3 and put fresh crew with 6th/camo in it, what for 2nd skills? Was planning to go for repairs but would gunhandling be better? Also what equipment should I run? Currently Rammer/vents but still wondering between optics, spall liner and GLD as a 3rd choice. Or even a toolbox? Few games I've had with this I've found myself spearheading assault up close and personal so not really gaining anything from Binos/Net. Oh, and it's already fully upgraded so weight isn't a problem.
  25. 1 point
    Rexxie

    Charioteer - does it need a buff?

    [tangent]It's not that the chariot needs buffs, it's that everything else needs nerfs. Everything that wasn't absurd a few years ago is now mediocre at best, and the chariot is no exception. They can keep buffing tanks all they want, but all it's doing is feeding the cycle that continually makes their game less enjoyable.[/tangent]