Jump to content

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/01/2019 in all areas

  1. 4 points
    quick review in case anyone's on the fence about funding Serb's moon base support heavium historically a medium - conventional non-autoloading version of the T54E1 was once tested as a tier 10 med a loooong time ago now dusted off the shelves for the moolah: https://tanks.gg/tank/m48t54e2/stats doesn't actually feel like an E5 gun a m a z e b a l l s meaty 360 alpha with sub 8 reload, good (226) pen and hitscan APCR good accuracy and best in class bloom with .10 base turret bloom - better than a Progetto -10 gun depression aim time only decent at 2.4s, though mitigated by bloom APCR 255 only means you struggle against heavily armoured targets basically the gun of a tier 9 medium overall: all-in-all best in class firepower tied with the Caern (less alpha, more DPM) and the 53TP (more alpha, less DPM). arguably even better than the above two if you fire full gold armour bad to unreliable tumour ~180EA large LFP ~150EA weak-ish UFP ~200EA tall hull larger than the E5 no beak - f no magical drive sprocket turret: 230-250 frontally, prominent shot trap and turret ring overall: more comparable to the Patton than the E5 does not get significantly better with angling or when using gun depression - will bounce some glancing shots 0.4 - 0.5 armour use efficiency which is armoured med territory - snap more for best results - wiggle when reloading mobility 45 top speed, 17 reverse (which is more than the tier 10 patton) 16 hpt baddish terrain resistances with particularly bad soft terrain stats - 3.26 decent traverse + neutral steering 35 degree/s turret traverse <3 gear ratio stuff (needs testing): nippy between 0-30, average heavy acceleration between 30-40, sluggish above 40 overall: goes 40-ish on most terrain but not otherwise significantly faster than a 53TP or an IS-3 good for taking positions and relocating but far from ideal for brawling - things like 50TPs and Chryslers are inexplicably more agile verdict good crew trainer in case you wanted two irrelevant tier 10 heavies decent earner but loses out to Paytriot/Lowe/240 alpha things, goldspam not necessary but addictive again, does not actually play like the E5 - if I had to describe it feels more like the 5A with the Super Conq's gun ridiculously gud at farming - even I can maintain 2k DPG without too much trouble winning potential: tied to Chrysler IMO but you win games by damage whoring and not tanking everything fun factor: as a heavium player this is the most fun I've had in a premium heavy value: IMO worth it if more than 50% off, YMMV OP? https://imgur.com/gallery/R5KFqZM
  2. 2 points
    hazzgar

    toxic light tanks

    I wanted to write a lot more but I'll only write 2 things: 1. What are the other advantages? 2. Also I'm not a social sciences guy. I am a signal transmission engineer. I just work in a different field. Also bagging on the whole social sciences makes you look like a moron. Another dweeb who hides his inferiority by trying to find faults in others. You would not have behavioral economics without psychology and sociology. You would not have neural networks without philosophy and cognitivism. You would not have accurate algorithms without anthropologists. Those are facts since those people are actually employed in said functions.
  3. 1 point
    yikes those are some pretty grindy masteries though.. for people that don't already average 850xp/g or more.. that's easily 2-300 games for most players?? stage 10 easily 500+ games for most players, no way they can complete the masteries in the amount of time but i guess that's why we have money
  4. 1 point
    hazzgar

    toxic light tanks

    He's saying stupid stuff. I'm stating facts but I need to grind credits so fine by me.
  5. 1 point
    hazzgar

    toxic light tanks

    1. Lights don't have better gun handling. This is confirmation bias on your part (yeah I know evil social sciences). If you for example took t10 lights and compared their gun handling to t10 meds you would see they land smack down in the middle in dispersion stats while having lower final accuracy, lower shell speed which leads to worse gun handling. If you add to that lower pen and a way bigger shell drop off you have a much worse performing gun. Then you have 300-1000 less dpm, less alpha and light guns are basically tier 8.5 medium tank guns. 2. Hand brake? How is light "hand brake" better? 3. Better repair speed means nothing when you have no armor and no hp. If you get tracked in a light you are dead. No good player (and I mean good, not 51% "good") takes repairs in their first 4 skills in a light. Hell probably first 6 skills 4. Agility - outside of T100 and EBR the speed difference is not big enough. A med will still be able to chase you and you won't be able to outrun it. And yeah some mid tier lights will have decent bloom but that's also because t8 meds are underpowered. HMTV is still shit. It has 400-600 less dpm than the tanks you mention. Same or 20m lower view range, not enough shells and is fairly slow for a light being capped at 63kph. Also ironically the Swedish t8 med with 360 alpha still has better bloom and shell speed than the HMTV. Though mid tier lights only serve your arguments as there are close to no fast mid tier meds. Also I would not call you a moron if you did not say something moronic about social sciences. You disregarded a huge chunk of science and you want me to respect your intelect? LOL Mate? Also the lack of consistent logic where you bash social sciences while also claiming to have a better grasp of lingistics. Sorry but one thing that's hard to respect is someone who can't adhere to a consistent logic within one post. Again seriously I'm medically diagnosed with problems with shit like that and you're worse than me. So it says a lot.
  6. 1 point
    hazzgar

    toxic light tanks

    My lame ass social science gave us behavioral economics which resulted in a Nobel from economy for Richard Thaler. They also gave us Amon Tversky and his studies on cognitivism or Daniel Dennet and his cognitivism studies. If you discard those people you are an uneducated moron but it's fun you are willing to say progressively dumber and dumber shit just because I offended you. Also can you please respon to my question. What other advantages lights have over meds and other tanks? Also again. I'm not a social scientist. I'm a signal analyst who got a job analyzing text.
  7. 1 point
    hazzgar

    toxic light tanks

    Mate you can self define but no one will accept your self definition. For the same reason everyone mocks the "I'm not racist but..." argument. If you are bad, you get called bad, even if you don't want to, it's not a gender discussion where you feel you are stats fluid and you are not present on the bad-good player spectrum. You say bad players say, your problems are those of a bad player hence you are a bad player. Also yes throwing an object through the window technically is the same but it's a phraseologism. English is a language you either speak well or not. Finally your argument of "Good players lose many times" - No mate. The definition of a good player is someone who wins more than an average player. This is also how we assess tanks. If a tank is bad at positively influencing the game outcome it is a bad tank. I have not agreed to anything. Your definition of a tank being game breaking because it makes the game uncomfortable for you in a very specific scenario without limiting your ability to win against you is plain dumb. It makes no sense. Unless light tanks can carry late games super well they are not problematic. You Also mention Light changes but you are uninformed. Lights have been changed not because they were game breaking. They were changed because WG streamlined the matchmaker and wanted to remove any non standard MM tanks. The only ones that are left are prems and like 1-2 super old tanks. The only thing you are right is broken vs good. Lights are not good but what's broken about lights? The only advantage they have vs other tanks is camo. They have the same or sometimes lower view range than same tier meds and some heavies. They have shit guns with no pen, accuracy, dpg or alpha. They are only marginaly faster than same tier soft meds with a few exceptions. The only thing they have is camo and only a few light tanks actually have good camo. A sheridan has lower stationary value than an obj430U, and only 10% higher moving camo than 430U. The only broken light is the EBR 105. The rest are fine, some even require buffs. Also please don't be a child and when I accuse you of crying you say "no u are crying". What are you 5? FFs. If you want to take a jab at me at least invent your own. Your rhetoric is as bad as your arguments. This one is funny because it's not true. You are one of the most neg repped people on this forum who are not banned, if we count active users you are the most neg repped. . That's a clearly checkable fact. I don't want to be a dick but you're wrong again. I am judging you therefore disproving this theory. I won't. Though if you continue to post please stop the stream of consciousness. You are not Faulkner. Re read what you post, think about it. Then post. PS. I'm not angry. I enjoy telling clearly deluded people they are stupid. I'm an asshole and the one thing I hate the most in life is bad logic and rhetoric so this is very engaging for me.
  8. -1 points
    Diriz0n

    toxic light tanks

    Not buying it. You are full of self defining attention seeking junk. I did this, in this tank. I did that, in that tank. In I am sure what many don't even care about. You said it, though you are certainly not a mate, I for sure don't accept any of your junk you say while defining, entitling yourself. I call you a bad player, because you say silly things like camo net and setup binocs in the open. Things that merit being called a bad player. So if you know what a mirror is, allow me to serve the same function, learn how to play, baddy. Perhaps you are short on your own medicine, and would like a dose of it. An average player wins 49.6% of the time NA, and does so with 1.1K WN8. So a good player by definition, is one that secures above that, and a bad one is one that finds him or herself below those numbers. When people have played thousands of games, even a high win rate can pile up thousands of losses, which when using ten minutes of fifteen minute maximum, still comprises of alot of games and time. So yes, a good player still loses many battles. Easiest when viewed in an absolute, you are making absolutely no sense at all because everyone on this forum is statistically a good. But you choose to wantonly label and define, at a whim, people as good or bad. This is the problem with you subjective social science individuals. You make your own rules. Light tanks were changed because people were complaining about constantly being over-tiered. And there passed a golden opportunity to tier them fairly, while also increasing the tech trees to tier ten. They were then immediately changed in the revision, as to not be too powerful with their old parameters in lower tier settings. And camo is not the only advantage. That is just stupid saying that. My profile is open, I went through it yesterday. Go see for yourself. While doing so, omit this thread. But would I want to omit this thread? For sure not, I stand by what I have said. Again, the problem with you social science individuals, your schooling, your expertise - all of that nonsense, doesn't seem to accrue what is fact or fiction. You can't use the word fact, because you do not know what facts are. I think, though am not certain, another of your challenges is fragmented reading. Perhaps your lesser social sciences education, has taught you very well to skim over material, and just focus on what you believe important. I am not before pedestal, I am not out to judge you, for not only do I not know you but don't care to. This is not a house of parliament, not a courtroom, be the shit poster you want to be.
  9. -1 points
    Diriz0n

    toxic light tanks

    Go back to university, study your lame ass social science, or whatever stupid humanity, and graduate without still knowing fact from fiction. And continue spreading your nonsense, as to not discern that good means better than bad or average. That is fact, whether you choose to downplay it or not. It is fact. No when said -how- good or great. Good. Which means what? Good, better than bad and average. Shit poster, extraordinaire.
  10. -1 points
    Diriz0n

    toxic light tanks

    gun handling for one, smaller size for another, excellent terrain resistances, better agility and hand brake, better repair speed coefficients Like seriously, an HMTV light has some of the worst LT disp stats for a tier 8 LT, and it is counted as one of the best med tank disp stats, being comparable to Pershing, progetto, T44. How do you not see that, that is like a free vert stab. And here comes the insults. And l get the ro, the MlNUTE l say something like that. Here we go. You just can't be civil. You NEED to insult. It is not just your posts are full of shit, you feel the need to call someone a piece of shit. The second, like the second l try that, Has fires a missile at me. or roh, l don't fucking know who. Not my fault someone trips your nerves. Learn to play. Learn to read. And data, fact, not your lame fiction. The difference is, while I may be keen to disagree, to tear into your posts, to trash your background, show disgust in what you say.....you personally get offended and reflect that at me. There is a difference between getting mad at what one says, rather than mad at him. Don't hate the player, hate the game. You mad? Go listen to some tchaikovsky, your sort are good at it, and calm down.
×
×
  • Create New...