Jump to content

Assassin7

Moderation Crew
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    9,652

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    79

Assassin7 last won the day on November 11

Assassin7 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

4,354 Excellent

See reputation activity

5 Followers

About Assassin7

  • Rank
    HEAT slinging Thunderfuck

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    https://www.twitch.tv/asassian7

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    New Zealand
  • Server
    NA

Recent Profile Visitors

390,909 profile views
  1.    cvshaft reacted to a reply to a status update: After only 10 yrs of WoT, I have finally 2 marked my first tank - Chaffee. Too bad th
  2.    Assassin7 reacted to a post in a topic: Posting permissions for unverified users temporarily removed
  3.    Private_Miros reacted to a reply to a status update: omfg, these god damn spambots making OVER THREE HUNDRED THREADS THAT I HAD TO DELETE
  4. Assassin7

    omfg, these god damn spambots making OVER THREE HUNDRED THREADS THAT I HAD TO DELETE INDIVIDUALLY

    1. Private_Miros

      Private_Miros

      Beep me - I can do that in the AdminCP in batches, but the changes are not immediate.

    2. Assassin7

      Assassin7

      hmm I think its okay, I just went into the adminCP and found a bunch of settings, I changed it so it auto deletes all content of anyone who gets flagged as a spammer, which should help

  5. hall_monitor

    Hello, sorry to bother,
    I've just made this account, and I realized I didn't spell my username the same as my WoT account.  Is it required that they are the same?

    1. DrWeb7_1

      DrWeb7_1

      This isn't neccessary.

  6.    RedwoodOriginal reacted to a reply to a status update: It makes me sad to see that this community has more or less died. Oh the good ole day
  7. Assassin7
    I think they'll move their head offices to the EU somewhere. Maybe even make the paris office the new primary one, since expanding an already established office to me makes more sense than setting up a new one.
  8. Assassin7
    you should be able to just double click on the replay file itself and it'll open it. You don't need to copy it to the desktop or drag it to the launcher. Oh, actually because you are dragging it over the launcher, you are trying to open it with the WoT launcher file. not the WoT application file. to drag it over you need to open it with the worldoftanks.exe file, which is the file for the actual game, rather than just the launcher.
  9.    Strawberry_Milk reacted to a reply to a status update: What is the current unicum tank of choice for random battle dominance? Obj 140, STB-1
  10.    Tman450 reacted to a reply to a status update: What is the current unicum tank of choice for random battle dominance? Obj 140, STB-1
  11.    DrWeb7_1 reacted to a status update: https://wotlabs.net/na/player/God_0f_Fap okay what the fuck? 1850dpg and 14K WN8 in a
  12. Assassin7

    https://wotlabs.net/na/player/God_0f_Fap

    okay what the fuck?

    1850dpg and 14K WN8 in a PzIII E?

    1. Panzergraf

      Panzergraf

      SA bot farming, it's what HACKD/HECKD does, usually in platoons.
      1850 DPG is still impressive though.

    2. DrWeb7_1

      DrWeb7_1

      I thought RU servers are 'pros' at low-tier stat boost, but I was wrong.

  13.    WhatTheSkara reacted to a reply to a status update: T30 is such a stupid tank. Can't hit shit at range, misses when fully aimed at 100m (
  14.    Assassin7 reacted to a post in a topic: What this forum is, and how to gain acceptance
  15. Assassin7

    im looking at these field modifications for my STB, none of them at all seem worth the tradeoffs. at all. I'd rather just leave it as it is. 

  16.    ZXrage reacted to a post in a topic: Taliban coming to wot, 2x950 on t8, yolo
  17.    Madner Kami reacted to a post in a topic: Taliban coming to wot, 2x950 on t8, yolo
  18. Assassin7
    7 sec aim time... Bruh.
  19. Assassin7
    Those mega buff skills, and how they are implemented, dont sit well with me either. The fact you have to spec into specific skills in one specific section to unlock a specific buff is a terrible, stupid design IMO. There are so many different tanks with so many different play styles, and so many different strengths and weaknesses, that forcing you to spec into a specific section to get a mega buff removes choice, and gimps your crew, either by forcing you into sub optimal regular skills to get the mega buff you want, or forcing you to forgo the mega buff gimping you that way.
  20. Assassin7
    Ive just seen QBs video on this, didnt even know it was out until today. Its beyond a joke. They havent changed any of the fundamental problems that I had with it whatsoever, they've just removed a bit of RNG from it but in the process made it even more pay2win, based on his video. The entire system as a concept needs to be completely scrapped. If it goes into the game with it even close to this, I see no reason to bother playing it again.
  21.    WhatTheSkara reacted to a post in a topic: Crew 2.0
  22. Assassin7
    Thats something I think you'd find better answered by the WOWS forums or Wargaming Technical support unfortunately
  23. Assassin7

    played first couple of games of tanks in ~2-3 months.

    is it just me or is the camera raised up above the tank more than before? Or have I just been playing far too much War thunder?

    also, that tactical camera thing is awful, so glad I could turn it off

  24. Assassin7
    does this mean they're gonna put it in? Fuck sakes.
  25. Assassin7

    soooo, I just got the STB-1 in War Thunder.

    and, just like its WoT counterpart, its absolutely bonkers good. 

    Im in love, all over again, in a completely different game. 

    fuck yes

    1. MagicalFlyingFox

      MagicalFlyingFox

      The problem with the Japanese tree is that there is nothing to go with the STB-1 :(

    2. Assassin7

      Assassin7

      frankly the entire tree is like that lol, short of 4.7 and 6.7. 

      either way, Im in love. 

  26. Assassin7

    Screenshot_20210621-143122.jpg

    Fuck spammers, sometimes I feel like non mods are lucky they dont have to look at shit like this all the time lol.

    Fun times going down and permanently deleting 30 spam topics just to clear my recent topics feed.

  27. Assassin7
    I dont like it. I think the idea is... just dumb. They aren't fixing core issues that would make the game better. they're just adding layers upon layers of baggage on top of it until it gets smothered IMO. I think its similar to the proposed crew system. Its just... too over bloated and complicated. I dont know how to explain it, I just think... the core game should stay as it is. Changes and additions to the game of this type I think should be in areas that don't change the core gameplay. For example equipment 2.0, that's something that actually was implemented
×
×
  • Create New...