Jump to content

Rexxie

Moderation Crew
  • Content Count

    12,550
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    121

Reputation Activity

  1. Like
    Rexxie reacted to Archaic_One in Is this forum dead?   
    Nevermind, I'm saltier than bacon sometimes.  You have a great and joyous day my friend
  2. Like
    Rexxie got a reaction from Assassin7 in Is this forum dead?   
    you were so cute back then its okay
  3. Upvote
    Rexxie got a reaction from sundanceHelix in WT Pz 4 worship thread   
    Hyper necro. This is still a sublime damage farmer. I was expecting it to be crept out of the game, but this is the best bush camper I've played in years. Usually turreted TDs have guns noticeably worse than what casemate TDs have; the waffen IV not only has a comparable gun, it's straight up the best T9 TD gun.
    If you like big numbers on your session stats, buy this. 3.5k DPG isn't difficult. 4k DPG is definitely possible. I'm at 5k without much APCR, but rolling Prokh once padded that, I have no idea how you'd sustain that much.
    Rammer/Binocs/Turbo. You can run IRM for quicker target acquisition instead of a more reliable early hit. I don't think the 150 is remotely competitive with the 128.
  4. Upvote
    Rexxie got a reaction from RedwoodOriginal in Supertest: Kpz 07 RH   
    Looks awful. Low alpha, no armor, big turret, low hp, bad accuracy, mediocre view range, bad pen and velocity. DPM is only 2180 base, which is not impressive give what I just said.
    Needs more dpm and better accuracy imho. It wont be good but it would be fun. Right now it is basically a slow HWK with less gundep and camo.
  5. Upvote
    Rexxie got a reaction from sohojacques in Supertest: Kpz 07 RH   
    Looks awful. Low alpha, no armor, big turret, low hp, bad accuracy, mediocre view range, bad pen and velocity. DPM is only 2180 base, which is not impressive give what I just said.
    Needs more dpm and better accuracy imho. It wont be good but it would be fun. Right now it is basically a slow HWK with less gundep and camo.
  6. Upvote
    Rexxie got a reaction from metljoe in Equipment 2.0 Builds   
    The point at which Modified Configuration becomes viable on your average tank is when you can no longer have your ammorack damaged by any one shell. Your ammorack will get damaged as soon as its module HP is lower than the "repaired module hp" stat on that module. 
    Unfortunately this requires stat hunting. Some tanks have a really hard time achieving this. Others have no problems at all. For example, a Chrysler (280 ammorack hp, 190 repaired ammorack hp) with Modified Configuration basically wont get ammorack damaged ever again. A Liberte (250 ammorack hp, 200 repaired ammorack hp) needs Modified Config, Safe Stowage, and the Safe Stowage Directive to achieve the same thing.
  7. Like
    Rexxie reacted to Nicarasu in Bun's thread of Transitional Cataloging and discussion (and shenanigans).   
    I'd never really paid attention to this thread before now, but around two years ago now I figured out that I was a girl. I can't really do anything about it other than very little things due to my living situation, but I'm working on remedying that. I'm glad to discover this thread and see I'm not alone as a trans person here ^^
  8. Like
    Rexxie got a reaction from Nicarasu in Bun's thread of Transitional Cataloging and discussion (and shenanigans).   
    A little update on me!
    It has been a ride! I'm a girl now, my name is Clover. I've been really well! Hope you're all okay!
  9. Upvote
    Rexxie got a reaction from Ezz in Steel Hunter - Yet another game mode   
    The real downside to the Harby is the obnoxious voice lines 
  10. Upvote
    Rexxie got a reaction from Panzergraf in I just got the SU-100M1...   
    I don't think there's a lot to worry about. The SU-100M1 has much better armor, especially for the tier, but with 850 HP and such low alpha a couple unexpected pens during your trades can end your match. The SU-101 is much more well rounded with more reasonable alpha (even for the tier) and extremely high pen. You do lose out on bullying same-tiers like the 100M1 can do, but IMHO the SU-101 with its 340 HEAT and 440 alpha is way more dangerous to a T10 than the SU-100M1 is to a T9.
    With that said, my big problem with the SU-101 is just how much overlap it has with the WZ-120-1G. The WZ is a much better tank. The 100M1 is definitely more unique.
  11. Like
    Rexxie reacted to Alesia in Bun's thread of Transitional Cataloging and discussion (and shenanigans).   
    Still remember this thread sometimes even though I don't play WOT in the slightest anymore.
     
     
    Basically things are going well enough.  Things with Nate took a turn and we ended up dating, and are now planning to have a hand fasting ceremony since we are both pagan.  So essentially getting married but without the legal stuff.  I'm also dating another transwoman long distance but she's amazing.  We are all poly so things remain open but I can't imagine being without either of them by this point.
     
    As far as physical stuff, I have D cups now (pushing on E!) and my hair is halfway to the small of my back but still getting longer.  I did end up getting on bio identical progesterone which has been a trip of rapid physical changes.  I went from an A to a D cup in like 1 year 8 months which was mind blowing to me, after so long of just not having any real growth.  SRS has been put off indefinitely because of covid of course but I'm also still not sure if I can handle the pain and recovery more then anything.
     
    I did end up moving to texas for like 2 weeks and then went back to Washington, with Nate, with cats....it was hell.  We were homeless for like a week as well but we finally found an apartment and got set up.  We remain poor as absolute fuck and I cant find work to save my life but...we will make it I'm sure.  IDK how but we will.
  12. Upvote
    Rexxie got a reaction from Nicarasu in Name and Shame Part II Probably Sponsored by Universal Studios and Chrysler   
    maybe dont call the xo of pbkac a hacker for beating you if you're in a petco clan. idk sounds like a sketchy idea
  13. Upvote
    Rexxie got a reaction from Panzergraf in Name and Shame Part II Probably Sponsored by Universal Studios and Chrysler   
    maybe dont call the xo of pbkac a hacker for beating you if you're in a petco clan. idk sounds like a sketchy idea
  14. Like
    Rexxie got a reaction from SkittlesOfSteeI in Name and Shame Part II Probably Sponsored by Universal Studios and Chrysler   
    maybe dont call the xo of pbkac a hacker for beating you if you're in a petco clan. idk sounds like a sketchy idea
  15. Upvote
    Rexxie got a reaction from Shrewarmies in Name and Shame Part II Probably Sponsored by Universal Studios and Chrysler   
    maybe dont call the xo of pbkac a hacker for beating you if you're in a petco clan. idk sounds like a sketchy idea
  16. Like
    Rexxie got a reaction from sohojacques in Name and Shame Part II Probably Sponsored by Universal Studios and Chrysler   
    maybe dont call the xo of pbkac a hacker for beating you if you're in a petco clan. idk sounds like a sketchy idea
  17. Upvote
    Rexxie got a reaction from GehakteMolen in Object 705...thread   
    It took me a long time, but I'm burning through my last few games in this vehicle. And also my last drops of patience. Mediocre armor, average gun, bad mobility, no depression. The 705 fails at the entire heavy trifecta while not even having comfort to ease the pain. Absolutely the worst T9 I've played since I ground the Type 4 five years ago.
  18. Upvote
    Rexxie got a reaction from igorCRO in VK 4502B: Troll or be Trolled Appreciators Guild   
    Finished this 3-mark at about 3.5k combined. It wasn't that bad, some thoughts:
    If anything gets changed about this tank, it needs to be the gun. Its a fucking blunderbuss and should hit as hard as the E75's. APCR spam is the only way to be competitive. The gun will hit, but not where you want. Make that not matter. Rammer/Vstab/Hardening. Nothing abnormal. Food for the final stretch. I give the tank a B. As in, Balanced. I give the gun a B. As in, Bastard. Not worth buying while the E75 is as good as it is, but keep an eye on this for buffs.
  19. Upvote
    Rexxie got a reaction from Nicarasu in Unconventional WoT Opinions 3   
    Arty is worse to play against with stun and rof than it was with higher damage.
  20. Upvote
    Rexxie reacted to Panzergraf in How to ammo rack   
    Some times, when you shoot an ammo rack, it explodes.
  21. Like
    Rexxie reacted to ZXrage in Measuring the Anonymizer   
    I wanna contribute to this, I've already gathered 20 (full) anon'd replays from my Leo 1 escapades. I'll try to finish the other half soon but I'm busy with uni stuff
  22. Upvote
    Rexxie got a reaction from Katariana in Why aren't YOU playing KV-5? The Better-Than-IS-6 Appreciation Thread   
    Still playing this tank. With all that has been done, I was prepared for the KV-5 to be really painful to play now, but I think I was wrong. Still an absolutely brutal tank, really fun to just crush people. Real femdom hours. 
  23. Upvote
    Rexxie reacted to 3MAJ86 in Measuring the Anonymizer   
    So, while Rexxie is analyzing our replays, I did a simple spreadsheet from the data collected. I wanted to check does something change in my performance, and I think it does! 
    Have a look at the image below: (NO column means no anonymizer, and YES obviously means yes )
    Each tank has 20 battles, 10 with and 10 without, except for T-34-3 where I messed up, and accidentally didn't include one replay in analysis, so there is 9 battles in "YES" part and 10 in "NO". 
     

     
    So when using, I win more, I do more damage, I kill more opponents, but interestingly I have lower assisted damage! This is telling me, that subconsciously I am playing more aggressive with anonymizer than without. Personally i didn't feel any difference about getting focused more or less. The only thing what happened is that I got toxic, post-game message once, and this happened while not using the anonymizer. I play with the chat turned off, so I can't measure level of toxicity during the battles. 
    Also what might be the case is low number of battles. For example, i had really shitty sessions with E5. I got set on fire so many times. It happened that 2 battles in a row i got lit with the first shot i received, practically starting my game with 1/3 of my hitpoints. On the other hand side, with Obj430U i got a monster 7000 dmg game, which is pulling the average up. 
     
    Maybe it wouldn't be bad that, those participating in the experiment also check their own performance. Are you changing something in your play? Maybe you are doing it subconsciously! 
     
    What do you think?
     
     
  24. Upvote
    Rexxie got a reaction from 3MAJ86 in Measuring the Anonymizer   
    I noticed that, thank you! Seeing your full detailed stats is what reminded me.
  25. Upvote
    Rexxie got a reaction from FavreFan4ever in Developer Diaries: Italian Heavy Tanks   
    I think the way WG shows off hull armor on all their videos/media is super misleading. They show off eff. armor values for a 0 normalization shot, which is kind of ridiculous. Whenever you see their armor values you always have to subtract 30mm or more from it to get something more like what you're going to be firing at.
    The armor is a 215mm UPF, 115mm LFP, 240mm mantlet, 240mm cheeks. What they're showing to you is stupidly inflated. The armor is worse than an emil, let alone a well armored heavy.
×
×
  • Create New...