Private_Miros
-
Content Count
3,932 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
29
Recent Profile Visitors
-
Panzergraf reacted to a reply to a status update:
I love WG support. "you got banned for unsportsmanlike conduct". "ok but for what exa
-
sohojacques reacted to a reply to a status update:
I love WG support. "you got banned for unsportsmanlike conduct". "ok but for what exa
-
Snoregasm2 reacted to a status update:
Ranked got me my very first chat ban I think. Although, honestly, I cannot remember w
-
Ranked got me my very first chat ban I think. Although, honestly, I cannot remember why that would be.
-
I actually asked WG to motivate the ban and point out my infraction.
I got this answer: "there is substantial evidence within our register, which shows that the ban is absolutely legitimate"
To which I responded: Can you share this substantial evidence?
Answer: "we don't manage the insult in World of Tanks anymore"
Reaction: but how can is there substantial evidence then? What was the violation or are the violations specifically?
Answer: "I invite you to stop breaking the game rules in the chat or you will face stronger sanction in the future, or even a definitive one." / ticket closed.
-
-
Reaction:
Answer: "With regards to this case, you were found in violation of our game rules and was given a temporary chat suspension. Specifically inappropriate behaviour in chat." / ticket closed
--------------
So no idea how their system works. I generally don't use swear words, though the occasional well that was fucking stupid/retarded/idiotic might be there. So either it's a counter that never resets. Or someone got very salty at me and reported me, most likely a platoon.
-
-
huj Well, that was fun.
-
Private_Miros reacted to a status update:
the Kunze Panzer... somehow this wound up in my garage lol Kinda like it? Feels like
-
Private_Miros reacted to a status update:
Just got the Chimera. What's the over/under on how long it will take to get the 279?
-
ZXrage reacted to a post in a topic:
WN8 and Spotting Damage
-
ZXrage reacted to a post in a topic:
WN8 and Spotting Damage
-
Private_Miros reacted to a post in a topic:
WN8 and Spotting Damage
-
Hellsfog reacted to a post in a topic:
WN8 and Spotting Damage
-
sohojacques reacted to a post in a topic:
WN8 and Spotting Damage
-
sohojacques reacted to a post in a topic:
WN8 and Spotting Damage
-
sohojacques reacted to a post in a topic:
WN8 and Spotting Damage
-
The average for players with over 10k battles is somewhere around 51-52% and 1300-1400 WN8.
-
Private_Miros reacted to a post in a topic:
WN8 and Spotting Damage
-
Sigh.. Firstly, you cared enough to make a whine thread here. Secondly, people judge skill on the basis of it, since it's all things considered a good global skill measuring stick on the macro scale. Someone with 1k WN8 isn't going to be worth it by any standards. Someone with 2.5k WN8 might be good, but you need to review tanks and tiers played to get a complete picture. Thirdly, compared to someone with 2k or 3k WN8, you have a lot less fantastic games. That shows in the stats. As explained above someone with 3k WN8 in his scouts will have more 5k spotting games as well.
-
The fact that WN8 is a relic by now aside there's a few points: it was developed with the tools available. Damage upon assistance was simply not available as a data input - and still isn't for the whole account, only in recents. WN8 certainly, never, at any point, was meant as a measure for performance in single battle. It was meant as a global performance scale. LTs generally have been extremely good for WN8 farming since if you play them well, you generally also get a lot of late game damage and kills, even if the occasional large spotting game goes "unrewarded" in that p
- 11 replies
-
- 10
-
-
-
For now completely gone. The system only looks at life time battle xp earned. But that is IMO likely to change for a further test iteration. Now it's just the basics.
-
Nearly all my crews are 2-3 skills. You don't need more to be competitive. The third skill wasn't even that needed, it's just because you lose one commander skill on sixth sense, and the second skill is BIA. So the third was needed for the view range skills. Make sixth sense default and you only need 2 crew skills to be competitive IMO. The new system seems to make the gap between pay2progress and others, and between people who really focussed on crew training to 5-6 and up skills and others even bigger than currently.
-
Supertest is out. I think it might have potential. At first sight, the conversion seems alright-ish (not quite sure on that yet). There seem to be a few useful new skills that might have a big impact on some vehicles (significantly reduced dispersion on the move on EBRs going over 40km/h seems fun). Overall effectiveness is down though. Compared to BIA crews everything seems to have taken a hit. What's the WoTLabs view?
-
122 TM (Chinese premium MT)
Private_Miros replied to Deus__Ex__Machina's topic in Upcoming Changes Discussion
I'm not bothering with it. I see good players struggling to get damage in fast games, and even in non fast games it's an opportunist at best. It lacks the DPM to brawl or to defend itself when over extending. It is at best a decent credit earner for the average player who with good standard rounds and high alpha will make a sizable amount of profit from the average game. -
T-55A is my nemesis. Struggling to get games with over 1k damage in this piece of crap. It never hits any shots.
- Show previous comments 6 more
-
Loading HEAT helped.
-
-
-
Private_Miros reacted to a post in a topic:
Free Gameplay Reviews (YT with commentary) by Kolni, Part 2: Electric Boogaloo
-
Sandobox, HE 3.0, what people think?
Private_Miros replied to Hoenn's topic in Upcoming Changes Discussion
Strong words for 52% 1700 player (with 54% 2150 recents). I do notice you have a bit of victim complex. Might it be that rather than moderation pulling favourites you're just a shit poster hiding behind an alt? -
Private_Miros reacted to a post in a topic:
Sandobox, HE 3.0, what people think?
-
Wrong section, basically unreadable. Just gonna go and throw this in the poubelle.
- 1 reply
-
- 2
-
-
-
Private_Miros reacted to a post in a topic:
Free Gameplay Reviews (YT with commentary) by Kolni, Part 2: Electric Boogaloo
-
Thanks a bunch. I feel I progressed since last time you did this in both decision making when I'm in the right spots, and in recognizing where I make mistakes myself (my comments in the post with replays align with what you identify as biggest mistakes). My main issues remain readjusting my locations when I'm not in the right spots, daring to push timely and correctly and optimizing target selection. That and there are still a lot of micropositioning spots for early aggression I lack the knowledge of. (On a side, note, I would always have gone hill on Malinovka, but that scout dying,
-
Private_Miros reacted to a post in a topic:
Free Gameplay Reviews (YT with commentary) by Kolni, Part 2: Electric Boogaloo
-
Actually giving this clan thing a try again.
Actually still only had contact with those that I already knew before.
Dear
I hate to create another topic, but Ticket ID 130724155 was closed before I got a satisfactory response - despite the quite explicit "If you have more questions, please feel free to contact us again."
In that ticket it was stated that the time stamp and log of alleged violation cannot be provided as "we don't manage the insult in World of Tanks anymore", yet at the same time it is communicated clearly that "there is substantial evidence within our register, which shows that the ban is absolutely legitimate".
These two statements are extremely contradictory. You cannot state both that you somehow have massive logs of my committing substantial violations (which I refute) while not managing that information at all.
It is my right as a consumer to understand and get a motivated reasoning behind an action negatively affecting me, without me being threatened by "invit[ing me] to stop breaking the game rules in the chat or you will face stronger sanction in the future, or even a definitive one." That breaking the game rules is an offense and that sanctions are attached to offenses is self-evident.
This issue has gone from me asking the exact time stamp and log of this serious violation warranting a chat ban (which I shall submit to if justified but wish to know the reason of - as is my right) to customer support bluntly accusing me of being a serial and substantial violator of the game rules!
Kind regards