ZXrage
-
Content Count
5,533 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
1 Follower
Recent Profile Visitors
-
Why are 15-1 blowouts so frequent? Are tanks dying much faster these days compared to 2-3 years ago?
-
IMO a combination between higher alpha tanks, more tanks that are unbeatable hulldown, map design featuring key locations that are almost impossible to recover from, and an influx of bad players since everyone is at home.
That said, I actually feel like the games last longer when they don't blow out, and my draws have doubled compared to 2015-2016. -
I haven’t had the issues of 15-1 blowouts that often yet (thankfully) but I have noticed the matches are much faster as of late. Probably down to all the faster high alpha tanks they added.
-
-
-
-
-
ZXrage reacted to a reply to a status update:
Gr33tings all, From now on I will b3 r3placing all of my e's with 3's to set mys3lf a
-
ZXrage reacted to a reply to a status update:
Gr33tings all, From now on I will b3 r3placing all of my e's with 3's to set mys3lf a
-
-
-
man I wanted to off myself completely stock. I had the stock 88 so that's goldspam and with the stock tracks and engine you move like a bad heavy tank. After I elited it it was alright. The gun was fine but low alpha is low alpha, it doesn't have something crazy going for it like T-44-100 or spaghetti tank
-
Fucc I nearly shat my pants looking at my stats until I realized what day it was thank you Never, I am no longer bad
-
-
-
ohh baby
-
Unavailebow reacted to this
- Report
-
The only downside is tier 10 MM.
I much prefer playing the Pta for that sole reason.
-
Looking at skill playing in the RU server I can see that the anonymizer would work there pretty well. The RU usernames stick out like a sore thumb in NA, though
-
Sometimes I wish I was playing a 430/430U that way I could do everybody's job for them
-
Sometime I wish I was in an STRV so I don't have to do anyone's job for anyone.
-
sohojacques reacted to this
- Report
-
-
-
If they're going to differentiate the two tanks then they need to nerf SConq. Even after the buffs the E5 is still worse than Sconq. That thing has too much armor with too strong of a gun, I say one or the other It's not the news lmao he just has a hateboner for me for some reason
-
-
-
-
I looked over the American HT changes and here are my opinions: T32: Looks good on paper, but on execution it still doesn't come out very well. The DPM buff now puts it higher than the Rene for less alpha which is nice, the gun handling buff should help the tank not suck a massive D everytime I use it, but they haven't really fixed the fact that the AP pen is still garbage post-buff, the APCR pen is also still less than stellar, its accuracy is still kinda shit, and the tank is still too sluggish to get anywhere. I think it should get the 360 alpha buff the Tiger II got and tune the RoF to be ~Rene levels but I guess they wanted to differentiate. M103: The gun should be a lot better now since its getting the same DPM as current E5. The turret buff I hope is substantial enough so that I don't get farmed by everyone that can aim. It's still derpier than the Conq's gun but if the buffs go correctly you'd at least have the trade-off of better reload. T110E5: I still wouldn't pick this tank over the SConq. The DPM still falls short below the SConq, it has worse turret armor, worse gun depression, your turret dispersion is better but only marginally, you go faster but only marginally. S Conq can abuse its armor a lot better since the E5 armor profile has always been wonky. I sitll think they should make the US HT line more heavium-like and nerf SConq
-
The reverse speed? The tall-ass cupola? The fact that the S Conq exists? I am also very sad that that's all the E5 is getting. A buff's a buff, but at the same time a turret dispersion buff from .08 (really good) to .06 (also really good), a DPM buff and a tracking buff is hardly the work that tank needs
-
-
I've been thinking a lot on how to balance the E5 post-SConq, and have come to the conclusion it needs to be a better heavium -Buff gun depression to -10 -Return E5 armor to its pre-nerf state (gd that nerf was years ago) -buff alpha to 420 like Leo 1 -buff top speed/reverse speed to 40kph/18kph That way it could serve as a semi-fast semi-armored assault tank a la 277/5A without stepping on anyones toes SImilarly, nerf SConq back to -8 depression, there's no way it should be that good tbh To buff T32 you can give it the M46 gun with a DPM nerf To buff M103 just buff the turret roof that's it fuck that tank
-
https://thearmoredpatrol.com/2020/03/24/new-balance-the-next-steps/ Summary: -E 100 line rebalance (VK 36.01 (H), Tiger I-II, E 75) -IS-4 line rebalance (KV-3, KV-4, ST-I) -T110E5 line rebalance (T32, M103) (hell yeah) -wheelchair nerf (easier to slow down) Headed for Sandbox -Crew 2.0 -Equipment 2.0 (More class-based) Balance changes:
-
Aren't you a salty sausage
I have more downvotes than you
- Show previous comments 4 more
-
@Diriz0n are your reasons being a bot written by wot balancing department to mimic the shitposts generated by 44% tomatoes they listen too? The problem is WG is bad at what they do so they failed at making a working shitlord model, they got dissapointed and decided to release you on wotlabs since they are kinda salty about this forum
-
I don't know? That is what you are caught up on?
So, I am certain you are a useless imbecile, always have. But you don't see me spouting it all over the place. See how that works? If you provide me reason to express it, and in an allowed manner, why not?
Boo fucking hoo.
-
You are the most incomprehensible person I have met in a while. Seriously start reading books and learn how to form coherent sentences because you are so bad at expressing yourself you look like an art project.
-
-
I'm p sure Strv K is historical. There's an image somewhere floating online where the Kranvagn hull has a Centurion turret mounted because the Swedes bought a lot of Centurions from the Brits (Strv 81) EDIT: I was wrong about there being a photo but the plans did exist. http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/07/15/swedish-tanks-part-xii-emil-1952-1958/
