Jump to content

lifelessambition

Registered User
  • Content Count

    182
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation Activity

  1. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from Wyvernn in Not even going to rage. Just going to quit.   
    People focus too much on WR. IMO it really should be WN > WR > SR (survival rate) in terms of priority and importance.
     
    I go down peoples tank history sometimes and it always amazes me how I both outdamage them and outkill them in the same tank over hundreds of games by something stupid high like 25-50%, yet their WR for that tank is 5-10% higher. that's platoons. they get carried so again, wr alone means little. if you focus on that entirely, you will fail, you will get frustrated and you will not improve.  
     
     
  2. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from Thannos in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I really I don't care what you do, it affects me none. My assessment remains. I have nothing else to say to you other than im right and when it goes live you will see it.


    Troll-Bait
    Flaming
    Repeated Tinfoil Hattery Posts
    If you're going to be a cancer to this community, you will be cut out.

    Indefinite RO
    ~Kitti
  3. Upvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from Thannos in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I read a bit of this thread and my head is spinning at the absurdity I saw typed; here are my 2 cents.. if you want to devalue WN as a rating platform, do go ahead and start screwing with it based on the tanks people play.  We laughed at how irrelevant WG's rating is, yet here we you are going down the same path.
     
    It is beyond arrogant to try to dictate what tanks people play in order to get ratings.. for one it will backfire, and for second, it will further devalue platoons, which are already seen as stat padding means on their own, regardless of tanks.
     
    The power of WN comes from people considering it an accurate and FAIR measure ones APPROXIMATE skills. When you begin to ADJUST IT according to the NEEDS of CERTAIN players (which is what wn8 is really, lets be frank) it will hold as much weight as well.... paper.
     
    feel free to neg
  4. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from OldMonkei in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I read a bit of this thread and my head is spinning at the absurdity I saw typed; here are my 2 cents.. if you want to devalue WN as a rating platform, do go ahead and start screwing with it based on the tanks people play.  We laughed at how irrelevant WG's rating is, yet here we you are going down the same path.
     
    It is beyond arrogant to try to dictate what tanks people play in order to get ratings.. for one it will backfire, and for second, it will further devalue platoons, which are already seen as stat padding means on their own, regardless of tanks.
     
    The power of WN comes from people considering it an accurate and FAIR measure ones APPROXIMATE skills. When you begin to ADJUST IT according to the NEEDS of CERTAIN players (which is what wn8 is really, lets be frank) it will hold as much weight as well.... paper.
     
    feel free to neg
  5. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from Kablewee in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I read a bit of this thread and my head is spinning at the absurdity I saw typed; here are my 2 cents.. if you want to devalue WN as a rating platform, do go ahead and start screwing with it based on the tanks people play.  We laughed at how irrelevant WG's rating is, yet here we you are going down the same path.
     
    It is beyond arrogant to try to dictate what tanks people play in order to get ratings.. for one it will backfire, and for second, it will further devalue platoons, which are already seen as stat padding means on their own, regardless of tanks.
     
    The power of WN comes from people considering it an accurate and FAIR measure ones APPROXIMATE skills. When you begin to ADJUST IT according to the NEEDS of CERTAIN players (which is what wn8 is really, lets be frank) it will hold as much weight as well.... paper.
     
    feel free to neg
  6. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from Nelagend in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I read a bit of this thread and my head is spinning at the absurdity I saw typed; here are my 2 cents.. if you want to devalue WN as a rating platform, do go ahead and start screwing with it based on the tanks people play.  We laughed at how irrelevant WG's rating is, yet here we you are going down the same path.
     
    It is beyond arrogant to try to dictate what tanks people play in order to get ratings.. for one it will backfire, and for second, it will further devalue platoons, which are already seen as stat padding means on their own, regardless of tanks.
     
    The power of WN comes from people considering it an accurate and FAIR measure ones APPROXIMATE skills. When you begin to ADJUST IT according to the NEEDS of CERTAIN players (which is what wn8 is really, lets be frank) it will hold as much weight as well.... paper.
     
    feel free to neg
  7. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from Rexxie in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I read a bit of this thread and my head is spinning at the absurdity I saw typed; here are my 2 cents.. if you want to devalue WN as a rating platform, do go ahead and start screwing with it based on the tanks people play.  We laughed at how irrelevant WG's rating is, yet here we you are going down the same path.
     
    It is beyond arrogant to try to dictate what tanks people play in order to get ratings.. for one it will backfire, and for second, it will further devalue platoons, which are already seen as stat padding means on their own, regardless of tanks.
     
    The power of WN comes from people considering it an accurate and FAIR measure ones APPROXIMATE skills. When you begin to ADJUST IT according to the NEEDS of CERTAIN players (which is what wn8 is really, lets be frank) it will hold as much weight as well.... paper.
     
    feel free to neg
  8. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from Shackram in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I read a bit of this thread and my head is spinning at the absurdity I saw typed; here are my 2 cents.. if you want to devalue WN as a rating platform, do go ahead and start screwing with it based on the tanks people play.  We laughed at how irrelevant WG's rating is, yet here we you are going down the same path.
     
    It is beyond arrogant to try to dictate what tanks people play in order to get ratings.. for one it will backfire, and for second, it will further devalue platoons, which are already seen as stat padding means on their own, regardless of tanks.
     
    The power of WN comes from people considering it an accurate and FAIR measure ones APPROXIMATE skills. When you begin to ADJUST IT according to the NEEDS of CERTAIN players (which is what wn8 is really, lets be frank) it will hold as much weight as well.... paper.
     
    feel free to neg
  9. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from Shackram in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I really I don't care what you do, it affects me none. My assessment remains. I have nothing else to say to you other than im right and when it goes live you will see it.


    Troll-Bait
    Flaming
    Repeated Tinfoil Hattery Posts
    If you're going to be a cancer to this community, you will be cut out.

    Indefinite RO
    ~Kitti
  10. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from NavySnipers in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I really I don't care what you do, it affects me none. My assessment remains. I have nothing else to say to you other than im right and when it goes live you will see it.


    Troll-Bait
    Flaming
    Repeated Tinfoil Hattery Posts
    If you're going to be a cancer to this community, you will be cut out.

    Indefinite RO
    ~Kitti
  11. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from NavySnipers in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I read a bit of this thread and my head is spinning at the absurdity I saw typed; here are my 2 cents.. if you want to devalue WN as a rating platform, do go ahead and start screwing with it based on the tanks people play.  We laughed at how irrelevant WG's rating is, yet here we you are going down the same path.
     
    It is beyond arrogant to try to dictate what tanks people play in order to get ratings.. for one it will backfire, and for second, it will further devalue platoons, which are already seen as stat padding means on their own, regardless of tanks.
     
    The power of WN comes from people considering it an accurate and FAIR measure ones APPROXIMATE skills. When you begin to ADJUST IT according to the NEEDS of CERTAIN players (which is what wn8 is really, lets be frank) it will hold as much weight as well.... paper.
     
    feel free to neg
  12. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from Dlur in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I read a bit of this thread and my head is spinning at the absurdity I saw typed; here are my 2 cents.. if you want to devalue WN as a rating platform, do go ahead and start screwing with it based on the tanks people play.  We laughed at how irrelevant WG's rating is, yet here we you are going down the same path.
     
    It is beyond arrogant to try to dictate what tanks people play in order to get ratings.. for one it will backfire, and for second, it will further devalue platoons, which are already seen as stat padding means on their own, regardless of tanks.
     
    The power of WN comes from people considering it an accurate and FAIR measure ones APPROXIMATE skills. When you begin to ADJUST IT according to the NEEDS of CERTAIN players (which is what wn8 is really, lets be frank) it will hold as much weight as well.... paper.
     
    feel free to neg
  13. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from HibachiSniper in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I really I don't care what you do, it affects me none. My assessment remains. I have nothing else to say to you other than im right and when it goes live you will see it.


    Troll-Bait
    Flaming
    Repeated Tinfoil Hattery Posts
    If you're going to be a cancer to this community, you will be cut out.

    Indefinite RO
    ~Kitti
  14. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from Euchre in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I read a bit of this thread and my head is spinning at the absurdity I saw typed; here are my 2 cents.. if you want to devalue WN as a rating platform, do go ahead and start screwing with it based on the tanks people play.  We laughed at how irrelevant WG's rating is, yet here we you are going down the same path.
     
    It is beyond arrogant to try to dictate what tanks people play in order to get ratings.. for one it will backfire, and for second, it will further devalue platoons, which are already seen as stat padding means on their own, regardless of tanks.
     
    The power of WN comes from people considering it an accurate and FAIR measure ones APPROXIMATE skills. When you begin to ADJUST IT according to the NEEDS of CERTAIN players (which is what wn8 is really, lets be frank) it will hold as much weight as well.... paper.
     
    feel free to neg
  15. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from Praetor77 in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I read a bit of this thread and my head is spinning at the absurdity I saw typed; here are my 2 cents.. if you want to devalue WN as a rating platform, do go ahead and start screwing with it based on the tanks people play.  We laughed at how irrelevant WG's rating is, yet here we you are going down the same path.
     
    It is beyond arrogant to try to dictate what tanks people play in order to get ratings.. for one it will backfire, and for second, it will further devalue platoons, which are already seen as stat padding means on their own, regardless of tanks.
     
    The power of WN comes from people considering it an accurate and FAIR measure ones APPROXIMATE skills. When you begin to ADJUST IT according to the NEEDS of CERTAIN players (which is what wn8 is really, lets be frank) it will hold as much weight as well.... paper.
     
    feel free to neg
  16. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from CraBeatOff in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I read a bit of this thread and my head is spinning at the absurdity I saw typed; here are my 2 cents.. if you want to devalue WN as a rating platform, do go ahead and start screwing with it based on the tanks people play.  We laughed at how irrelevant WG's rating is, yet here we you are going down the same path.
     
    It is beyond arrogant to try to dictate what tanks people play in order to get ratings.. for one it will backfire, and for second, it will further devalue platoons, which are already seen as stat padding means on their own, regardless of tanks.
     
    The power of WN comes from people considering it an accurate and FAIR measure ones APPROXIMATE skills. When you begin to ADJUST IT according to the NEEDS of CERTAIN players (which is what wn8 is really, lets be frank) it will hold as much weight as well.... paper.
     
    feel free to neg
  17. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from tango_delta in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I read a bit of this thread and my head is spinning at the absurdity I saw typed; here are my 2 cents.. if you want to devalue WN as a rating platform, do go ahead and start screwing with it based on the tanks people play.  We laughed at how irrelevant WG's rating is, yet here we you are going down the same path.
     
    It is beyond arrogant to try to dictate what tanks people play in order to get ratings.. for one it will backfire, and for second, it will further devalue platoons, which are already seen as stat padding means on their own, regardless of tanks.
     
    The power of WN comes from people considering it an accurate and FAIR measure ones APPROXIMATE skills. When you begin to ADJUST IT according to the NEEDS of CERTAIN players (which is what wn8 is really, lets be frank) it will hold as much weight as well.... paper.
     
    feel free to neg
  18. Upvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from RuTle in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I read a bit of this thread and my head is spinning at the absurdity I saw typed; here are my 2 cents.. if you want to devalue WN as a rating platform, do go ahead and start screwing with it based on the tanks people play.  We laughed at how irrelevant WG's rating is, yet here we you are going down the same path.
     
    It is beyond arrogant to try to dictate what tanks people play in order to get ratings.. for one it will backfire, and for second, it will further devalue platoons, which are already seen as stat padding means on their own, regardless of tanks.
     
    The power of WN comes from people considering it an accurate and FAIR measure ones APPROXIMATE skills. When you begin to ADJUST IT according to the NEEDS of CERTAIN players (which is what wn8 is really, lets be frank) it will hold as much weight as well.... paper.
     
    feel free to neg
  19. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from SergeantMatt in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    I read a bit of this thread and my head is spinning at the absurdity I saw typed; here are my 2 cents.. if you want to devalue WN as a rating platform, do go ahead and start screwing with it based on the tanks people play.  We laughed at how irrelevant WG's rating is, yet here we you are going down the same path.
     
    It is beyond arrogant to try to dictate what tanks people play in order to get ratings.. for one it will backfire, and for second, it will further devalue platoons, which are already seen as stat padding means on their own, regardless of tanks.
     
    The power of WN comes from people considering it an accurate and FAIR measure ones APPROXIMATE skills. When you begin to ADJUST IT according to the NEEDS of CERTAIN players (which is what wn8 is really, lets be frank) it will hold as much weight as well.... paper.
     
    feel free to neg
  20. Downvote
    lifelessambition reacted to bjshnog in ⟪WN8⟫ Development / Resources   
    No.
  21. Upvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from WetRock in How many of you have Encounter Mode enabled?   
    I had it on for a bit, then I met redshire. Turned it off again.
     
    Then did a platoon and they had it on. Got redshire again, against fulcrum on the other side. all 3 of them. Miracle, we actually won. But now I wont platoon unless they have that shit turned off too. There is no excuse to play redshire encounter.
     
    It is sad because I like encounter on most maps.
  22. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from KraftLawrence in So how random are the teams, really?   
    What are you talking about and what are you negging it for? I just told you my data. My source is me. You are free to run your own so we can compare note, because im sure you have access to all the inner workings of the game yourself to do it otherwise. Instead you opt to post stupid shit just for the sake of trolling.
     
    This place is getting overrun with forumers it seems. No wonder even garbad wont come here no more. Im done, enjoy the official forums 2.0. Now with more stupid.
     
     
  23. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from Icantmove in So how random are the teams, really?   
    What are you talking about and what are you negging it for? I just told you my data. My source is me. You are free to run your own so we can compare note, because im sure you have access to all the inner workings of the game yourself to do it otherwise. Instead you opt to post stupid shit just for the sake of trolling.
     
    This place is getting overrun with forumers it seems. No wonder even garbad wont come here no more. Im done, enjoy the official forums 2.0. Now with more stupid.
     
     
  24. Downvote
    lifelessambition got a reaction from emperorguy in So how random are the teams, really?   
    What are you talking about and what are you negging it for? I just told you my data. My source is me. You are free to run your own so we can compare note, because im sure you have access to all the inner workings of the game yourself to do it otherwise. Instead you opt to post stupid shit just for the sake of trolling.
     
    This place is getting overrun with forumers it seems. No wonder even garbad wont come here no more. Im done, enjoy the official forums 2.0. Now with more stupid.
     
     
  25. Downvote
    lifelessambition reacted to Tav in So how random are the teams, really?   
    Cite your sources and data. Anecdote holds no weight here.
×
×
  • Create New...