Jump to content

nabucodonsor

Verified Tanker [EU]
  • Content Count

    866
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

nabucodonsor last won the day on December 10 2018

nabucodonsor had the most liked content!

About nabucodonsor

  • Rank
    Down On His Luchs

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Server
    EU

Recent Profile Visitors

37,787 profile views
  1. It looks like a STI that went to Chernobyl and came back like one of those three eyed fish from the Simpsons
  2. Oh yeah they are going to fuck it up pretty badly. But I believe alpha should not be nerfed they should rather increase the HP because: A) buffs are always better appreciated B) everyone likes big numbers and big booms. Also I forgot to mention before that they would also have to tone down the RNG aspect on pen and accuracy as otherwise weakspots will always be hard to hit even at close ranges.
  3. Buffing the HP is a given thing considering how fast teams crumble these days. Buffing the alpha is a stupid idea as you are not fixing the problem. Actually they are making it worse by buffing TDs who already don't need to spam gold. So practically when you will make a mistake you will punished much harder. For example TDs with 750 alpha on the live server need 4 shots on avg to kill a Maus. On the Sandbox server, taking in account the HP buff to it, it goes down to just a bit more than 3. As I have said before the WG does not understand how their game works especially the HP stat. A way simpler idea is to just remove gold rounds, bring back weakspots and call it a day. In this way you can balance tanks around their pen and add some dept to the game. For example you could give higher pen to heavies than mediums but increase HTs pen drop over distance. Let's imagine an IS7 with 270 AP pen vs a 260 APCR 140: at a 100m the pen on both tanks is the same as their original stat, but while the pen on the heavy starts to drop after the 100m, the medium's pen starts dropping at 400m. Also the IS7's pen at 300-400m should drop quite a bit forcing the assault heavy in a more cqc role. Furthermore mediums would keep a higher shell velocity while heavies will have the better normalization value to help them a close range. In this way tanks that cant flank at all should have enough pen to go trough the WEAKSPOTS of opposing tanks. TDs on the other hand would be the tanks who lose the least a longer ranger while keeping the highest pen. You could add even more dept to the game by differentiate tanks of the same kind by tweaking their pen/pen drop: for example sniping tanks like the Leo1 will have a lower pen drop than a 430u and a higher shell velocity. EZ but this would take more than two brain cells I guess
  4. The special rounds will retain the highest armor penetration amongst all shell types, and a high probability of inflicting damage as well. With these revisions, their alpha damage will likely be lower than that of basic shells, and their price will be higher. Special rounds will remain the optimal shell to fire at a heavily-armored target. What? Why? Because it deals less dmg so it is less credit efficient or they will keep the cost higher?
  5. That's why when I tried it a year ago or so I had the purple vstab on it. Basically a 5% to the handling which made it sufficient to snipe or get some snap shots. Also not inaccurate
  6. Leo is a great tank for the random meta: fast and with a great gun when fully aimed. The only thing bad about it was the handling. PS: also obj140 is overhyped
  7. @Kolni just out of curiosity what is your DPG  with the JT? I guess you are one of those people who could pull an avg over the 4k mark. Maybe even over the 4,5k?

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. Kolni

      Kolni

      also after the 357 changes tier 9 mm is nowhere near as abuseable right now so you'll probably see a global drop in dpgs there, doubtful anyone'll reach 4k+ on the tanks that aren't op af (standard b, t55, e50, t54 are pmuch the only tier 9s i see as 4k+ dpgable right now)

      having played one e50 game since the changes a few days ago, the mark jumped from 95 to 100 in one game, while the mark was done in march or something

    3. nabucodonsor

      nabucodonsor

      So I guess if you did like it you could pull it off easily. Yeah mediums like th t54 or e50 are probably better (or more fun to play) but personally I don't like the t54 as I don't like spremming as much in tanks so derpy. 

      I asked because of how stupidly strong the gun is compared to anything in the tier, 560 alpha with 350 apcr is absurd with that ROF. 

      But yeah it is a bit slow sometimes, if WG buffed the p/w it would be amazing.

      Anyway thx!

    4. Kolni

      Kolni

      more like i don't like it because i'm bad at it :doge: 

  8. Buff to the PTA? Lol so what is the point of the Leo1 anyway. You get the same gun at tier 9 with better MM. I guess they want to keep the old 9>10 meta. So wait in their rebalance they thought that the gold shell on Leo should have been only 315? Because SConq should have more pen right?
  9. Did you ever hear of the tragedy of Darth Plagueis the Wise? (best scene of the entire saga)
  10. WG is amazing in its own way: it always make you think it can't go any lower YET it still finds a way to sink even lower. GG
  11. Tanks.gg is bugged so are they that good hulldown? Haven't played 1.5 yet
  12. How can they even come up with these ideas? They are truly oblivious
  13. BERSERK TRANSLATED IS OUT WOOOO

    1. mistervanni

      mistervanni

      gogo miura, dont give up on us!

  14. For Berserk fanbois there is an interview of Miura on reddit. 

  15. Like arty removal? They know it's bad, they have admitted it is toxic but couldn't remove it because they were afraid of their player base (russian mostly) and now they can't because you need it to remove OP tanks in OP positions. Anyone who plays ranked or CW knows that some tanks are impossible to deal with without big HE guns. WG cant/doesnt want to fix the game so they can only make it worse
×
×
  • Create New...