Jump to content

Tman450

Verified Tanker [NA]
  • Content Count

    721
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Tman450 last won the day on July 25 2019

Tman450 had the most liked content!

About Tman450

  • Rank
    T23E3IsLoveT23E3IsLife

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Server
    NA

Recent Profile Visitors

12,839 profile views
  1. Chieftain/T95 (T8) or IS-5 for the tier 8 campain tank?

    1. Show previous comments  4 more
    2. CandyVanMan

      CandyVanMan

      Neither, their are ass.

    3. hall0

      hall0

      but you should never buy it for bonds. 

      T8 Chief is shit and so is IS5. But the medium has this horrible weakspot ontop which makes it even shittier. 

      Therefor I went for the IS5. I wont ever driving it. But at least I have it inthe garage. 

    4. kolni

      kolni

      IS-5 is also a hilariously sadistic mark to try for all skill levels, 1st through 3rd are all insanely hard considering the tank's gun

      Not to say the T95Chief mark is any less of that (I still haven't been able to do this one after completing it on basically release day), but at least you can play that tank without feeling like handicapping your team by picking it - this tank didn't have premium credits unlike the IS-5 when it was released however (not sure about the situation now)

  2. What's the consensus best EBR 105 equipment? I'm running CVS Optics Vents for a scout build.

    1. Show previous comments  2 more
    2. CandyVanMan

      CandyVanMan

      I would probably give the edge to LNES for EBR after giving it some thought, as you will mostly be playing the EBR as an active scout, and therefore you benefit quite a bit from the 8% camo bonus.

      If you were playing a normal light tank, having any more than 42% camo wouldn't make much of a difference, as you would be using bushes a lot more, compared to EBR.

      I think Prokh is the only map where CVS would be objectively better than LNES.

    3. crapcannon

      crapcannon

      CVS? Edit: nevermind found it on tanks.gg

    4. Tman450

      Tman450

      Thanks my dudes

  3. The HE would be nice, except it's almost impossible to use unless you have it preloaded because you would have to reload your entire magazine and loading a single shell takes almost 20 seconds. Expect to see some shitters spamming full HE out of this though.
  4. This thing is just awful, full stop. Extremely poor damage output, 4s interclip, horrible on the move dispersion. The armor and mobility are actually okay, -10 gun depression and decentish turret armor with some noticeable weakspots. the standard 268 pen 1400m/s APCR is nice, but the 325 pen HEAT has potato shell velocity (756m/s). The problem is this thing just cannot deal damage quickly enough. The absurd reload times are not worth having an autoreloader, as unlike the spaghetti mediums, the tank isn't flexible.
  5. Tman450

    ST-II

    I expected the IS-3-II to be the highlight of the line based on the test server when these were released. I was wrong, the IS-2-II is by far the best vehicle in the line. it's mobile, and most importantly the dual 100mm guns are fantastic. the IS-3-II isn't bad but it's also not good. the ST-II is gigatrash. Especially now that the IS-4 got buffed, but the ST-II didn't.
  6. Final 1.10.1 Changes Implemented Today: Changes to the technical characteristics of the following vehicles: Germany Panther mit 8,8 cm L / 71 Replaced the 8,8 cm Kw.K. 43 L / 71 gun with the 8.8 cm Kw.K. 43 L / 71 mod.Vlt. Compared to the previous gun, only shell damage changed from 240/240/295 to 280/280/370 HP E 50 Changed the reload time of the 8,8 cm Kw.K. L / 100 gun in the E 50 Ausf. B turret from 5 to 6 s Improved the armoring of both turrets Changed the penetration value of the PzGr 39 G shell for the 10,5 cm Kw.K. L / 52 Ausf. B gun from 220 to 230 mm Changed the damage value of the Sprgr 18 L shell for the 8,8 cm Kw.K. L / 100 gun from 295 to 370 HP Changed the damage value of the Pzgr 40 L shell for the 8,8 cm Kw.K. L / 100 gun from 240 to 280 HP Changed the damage value of the Pzgr 39 L shell for the 8,8 cm Kw.K. L / 100 gun from 240 to 280 HP Panther II Changed the damage value of the Sprgr 18 L shell for the 8,8 cm Kw.K. L / 100 gun from 295 to 370 HP Changed the damage value of the Pzgr 40 L shell for the 8,8 cm Kw.K. L / 100 gun from 240 to 280 HP Changed the damage value of the Pzgr 39 L shell for the 8,8 cm Kw.K. L / 100 gun from 240 to 280 HP E 50 Ausf. M Improved the turret armoring Leopard Prototyp A Increased the dispersion during movement of the Leopard Prototyp A1 suspension by 22% Increased the dispersion during movement of the Leopard Prototyp A2 suspension by 25% Increased the dispersion on hull traverse of the Leopard Prototyp A1 suspension by 22% Increased the dispersion on hull traverse of the Leopard Prototyp A2 suspension by 25% Increased the dispersion on turret traverse of the 10.5 cm L7A1 gun in the Porsche Standardpanzer turret by 20% Changed the aiming time of the 10,5 cm L7A1 gun in the Porsche Standardpanzer turret from 1.9 to 2 s China T-34-1: Changed the dispersion of the 100 mm 44-100JT gun in the T-34-1 model 2 turret from 0.42 to 0.4 m Decreased the dispersion of the 100 mm 44-100JT gun during rotation of the T-34-1 model 2 turret by 12% Changed the aiming time of the 100 mm 44-100JT gun in the T-34-1 model 2 turret from 2.9 to 2.7 s Changed the vehicle durability with the T-34-1 turret from 960 to 1,050 HP Changed the vehicle durability with the T-34-1 model 2 turret from 1,050 to 1,150 HP T-34-2 Replaced the 122 mm 37-122JT gun in the T-34-2 model 2 turret with the 122 mm 371-122JTX gun Compared to the previous gun: Shell damage changed from 390/390/530 to 360/360/530 HP Penetration values changed from 175/250/61 to 190/250/61 mm Changed the reload time from 15 to 12 s Changed the aiming time from 3.1 to 2.9 s Changed the dispersion from 0.48 to 0.44 m Changed the dispersion of the 100 mm 44-100JT gun in the T-34-2 model 2 turret from 0.42 to 0.4 m Changed the aiming time of the 100 mm 44-100JT gun in the T-34-2 model 2 turret from 2.9 to 2.7 s Improved the hull armor Changed the vehicle durability with the T-34-2 turret from 1,200 to 1,300 HP Changed the vehicle durability with the T-34-2 model 2 turret from 1,300 to 1,400 HP Decreased the dispersion during movement of the T-34-2 suspension by 9% Decreased the dispersion during movement of the T-34-2 model 2 suspension by 10% Decreased the dispersion on hull traverse of the T-34-2 suspension by 9% Decreased the dispersion on hull traverse of the T-34-2 model 2 suspension by 10% WZ-120 Decreased the dispersion of the 122 mm 60-122T gun during rotation of the WZ-120-1 turret by 12% Changed the reload time of the 122 mm 60-122T gun in the WZ-120-1 turret from 12 to 11 s Changed the top speed from 56 to 60 km / h Changed the vehicle durability with the WZ-120 turret from 1,550 to 1,650 HP Changed the vehicle durability with the WZ-120-1 turret from 1,650 to 1,750 HP 121 Improved the hull armor Increased the velocity of the Chuan bei-472 shell by 12% Decreased the velocity of the Po-122 shell by 9% Decreased the velocity of the Sha bao-472 shell by 9% Changed the penetration value of the Chuan bei-472 shell from 258 to 262 mm Changed the engine power from 580 to 650 hp Changed the vehicle durability from 1,950 to 2,050 HP U.S.S.R. Object 140 Improved the hull armor Changed the gun depression angle from -6 to -7 degrees
  7. They look great, assuming the real-world benchmarks are at least close to the performance numbers. 19% IPC increase, 8-core chiplet modules instead of 4-core modules for improved latency which is probably the biggest difference for gaming.
  8. WG gives it absurd stats but then a 16s reload to "balance" it out. is gud balance da
  9. 3080 is 40-60% faster than 2080, and 20-30% faster than 2080 ti. Nice gains but not earth shattering.
  10. People forget that the 2080 Ti was absurdly overpriced in the first place. The 980 Ti was $649 on launch and the 1080 ti was $699. This is finally bringing prices down to where they should be for that performance level. Now people think it's a fantastic deal, even though it's what it should be.
  11. I heard each core ALU has double FP performance so Nvidia just multiplied the real CUDA core count by 2. So to get the old CUDA core count divide by 2. This makes sense as to why all the cards have seemingly ridiculous amounts of CUDA cores: the core counts aren't equivalent. They're still gonna be fast as fuck, but I'll believe the claimed performance when I see it. Saying "Oh it's x % faster" when your benchmarks are using Raytracing and DLSS is bullshit, because the new cards have faster and more plentiful RT cores and tensor cores, so it's a meaningless comparison.
  12. I'm 6 out of 9 for wins in solo Steel Hunter atm, very enjoyable mode.

×
×
  • Create New...