Jump to content

simba90

Verified Tanker [NA]
  • Content Count

    97
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Status Updates posted by simba90

  1. So they're selling the type 59... lol

    1. simba90

      simba90

      Never mind, turns out i've been living under a rock. 

    2. Never

      Never

      Bro, if you hadn't posted this, I would probably not have known. Been looking for a Type 59 pretty much since I started playing in 2013. Finally have one now. I can die in peace. Thank you.

    3. GehakteMolen

      GehakteMolen

      im also like this, i WANT is and i NEED it, but 70 euro for prem tanks nr 15 or 20 (i lost count, hurr durr)...

      This is a real first world problem...

  2. My tin foil hat might be a bit tight; Has anyone else noticed a big upswing in ammo rack detonations? It seems like every other game at the moment has some poor bastard losing his/her head

  3. Is incoming the hitpoint/alpha rebalance currently on sandbox likely to change the viability of WN9?

    IIRC there wasn't enough of an upgrade to using WN9 to justify putting the effort into developing and pushing it out.

    1. Show previous comments  3 more
    2. simba90

      simba90

      @PlanetaryGenocide That would only work for recent values, Account overalls will be even more borked that before given that hitpoints/alpha is suddenly taking a ~20% jump up and you're no long comparing apples with apples for historical data. Kind of like when the broke the light tanks back in patch 9.something

      @Haswell Yeah I know WN9 is dead, but I was just wondering if the complete breaking of historical data would make RichardNixons pseudo running recent idea more viable?

    3. Snoregasm2

      Snoregasm2

      Are they actually pushing ahead with this? I was hoping that Russian backlast (like with the 430U proposed changes) would be strong enough to stop it happening.

      I would rather live with the current armour/gold ammo meta than the proposed changes.

    4. PlanetaryGenocide

      PlanetaryGenocide

      @simba90 fair enough, didn't consider that.

  4. https://worldoftanks.com/en/news/premium-shop/isu-130-pre-sale-0119/

    I feel this is unnecessary and going to piss some people off.

    1. Show previous comments  4 more
    2. Ham_

      Ham_

      Confirm can. Off pissed am.

    3. Assassin7

      Assassin7

      Seriously the only redeeming feature of that thing was its rarity. 

      Now its just a worthless TD

    4. simba90

      simba90

      Would probably make a good anchor for WoWs

  5. The object 277's APCR round is just plain nasty. I fully expect it to get nerfed in the near future.

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. hazzgar

      hazzgar

      In the 3-4 patches it will be like a super small nerf so speed nerfed to 1700, maybe nerf the pen to 345.

    3. MagicalFlyingFox

      MagicalFlyingFox

      "The object 277 has been met with both positive and negative reactions so we believe it to be balanced."

    4. hazzgar

      hazzgar

      In b4 I end up with 67% wr on a 16fps laptop while averaging 58-59% on most of my t10s like it was with the 268 v4...

  6. I see wesley001 has come back to WoT. The amazing thing was that he got third on his team for damage. Says a lot about the current state of the game when there are 12 players that do worse than him in a game.

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. hall0

      hall0

      Cool a unbalanced map returns. Just what I need after Fjord 1.0

       

      NOT 

    3. kolni

      kolni

      Didn't they remove Kharkov and Stalingrad for "gameplay" reasons? Same with Windstorm, making the scenery for a map that needs to have skyscrapers in the background along with a waterfront to the horizon is render ebola

      Port was a fun map though, but I think it'll be one hell of a heavy map if it's supposed to follow the same standard as the rest of the bunch

    4. nemlengyel

      nemlengyel

      Awww I remember days of yore playing Pz 38 nA on Port while having even less idea of what I'm doing that now :D Fun stuff

  7. I like the new scheme.

  8. So I'm curious to know what the consensus is on this forum about the new T9 Obj 430. I've heard almost nothing from anyone about it and given the sweet spot that T9 is in now I am a little surprised. I'm thinking that it is going to be a bit of fun and a variation from the T-54. The soft stats are the same as the t-54 and given that it is retaining is armour profile/camo rating and also has 1800 hitpoints I'm looking forward to playing it.

    1. Show previous comments  1 more
    2. monjardin

      monjardin

      Derpy gun with the same alpha as a tier 9 NATO medium. What's the point? I'd rather play a T-54 or WZ-120 at that tier.

    3. Fabunil

      Fabunil

      It is a bad gun on an excellent platform.

      Average but not nearly as bad as some people make it out to be (It definetly beats the ever forgotten WZ-120 by miles though).

       

    4. Tman450

      Tman450

      I think it's pretty good. The gun is meh, but it's a 122 so it has glorious Stalin overmatch. Accuracy is bad but gun handling is okay. Good DPM, great armor. Same profile as current 430. A but slower but has hovermed terrain resistance.

×
×
  • Create New...