Hellsfog

WG's habit of testing tanks at extremes before settling at some random point between the extremes and then randomly nerfing or buffing them makes it hard to get excited about ST stats. Does the new Italian look like the chieftain with a flatter turret face?

Small wonder your stories don't make sense. You're an idiot. The point of my post is that nobody in Relic gives two shits about me or what I am doing to bring me up in any conversation especially with an autist like you. There is no reason for them to give me a second thought. By the way, how much did it did the guy who plays you're tier 10 tanks charge you? Well that may be true but in terms of the boys in relic, I don't have an unusual or distinctive accent. The larger point was that he makes shit up as he goes and all because I said he posts were wordy and unreadable.

You're not even a good liar. So you're basically claiming all these guys, who I don't talk to and haven't spoken with in years and have no care about what me whatsoever, bring my name up in conversations, with a reject, out of the blue? And for extra gravy they mention I have an unusual accent? I don't have any kind of an accent you dumb cunt. Why would you bring my name up like we know each other? The only thing I know about you is you act like an asshole in strongholds before you get chucked, which is exactly what you doing here, being an asshole. The only mystery left is how long it will be before you wear out your welcome here as you have every place else you have been.

I think the better question is who you pay to play your account? I seriously doubt anyone fr0m Relic would speak with you since you're generally regarded as trash both as a human being and, unless it's a tier 5, in tanks as well. But I guess when your feelings are hurt, anger makes you say silly things.

I'm not shedding a tear for the type 5. I was observing that WG does nerf tanks and doesn't seem to mind nerfing some tanks into oblivion. I suppose WG's definition of over or under performing is flexible. P.S. Should I make my p0st longer with drivel. I feel that the thing is to make l0ng pointless p0sts and nob0dy reads.

But yet, WG nerfed the Type 5 and other tanks, I'm sure we could list if we cared to give some thought, into near uselessness. WG will nerf tanks but how or why is a mystery.

There would be fewer problems with the homefront MM is WG sold fuel instead of tiers.

If you're platooned with friends (assuming your friends aren't monkeys) it's relatively easy but harder with too many tier mismatches. It's actually fun before the grindiness sets in. Why do we need a fuel limit when tedium will work just as well. The 350 gold option speeds things up tremendously. Random teams, at least at this point in the event, are a disaster. Don't waste your fuel. One, maybe two, randoms in a premade ins't so terrible as long as you don't get the equivalent of squirrels with opposable thumbs. Pubbies wanted a historic mode. Turns out that shooting spitballs at Tiger I's isn't as much fun as they thought. The airstrikes between waves is a giant fuck you to slow tanks, pointless other than to destroy most of the cover you'd been using. The fact that the circles overlap to make a bigger circle is wonderful.

Given WG's history, I think there was some sarcasm in my post.

Three iterations of the CT should be enough to fix it.

Since nobody was banned, your interpretation is probably not correct so...

Clearly you didn't read or didn't understand what I wrote or simply didn't like it. One last time, the language is vague and neither you or I have any concrete idea what it means. I am certain, however, it does not cover simply being bad or merely passive.

My point was that being bad is not the same as being a bot and that if you want to complain about a specific player, which you are clearly doing, there's a thread for that. It's also silly to think that "excessively passive play" means anything. Does it mean camping behind a rock waiting for the enemy and then fighting best you can? Probably not. So unless you know what WG means by phrases like that one, this thread is you bitching about a bad player.

In case anyone was wondering, cheapbooks official forum thread has turned into a 30 page roast. http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/602288-winrate-is-not-a-reflection-of-player-skill/page__st__580__p__12170311#entry12170311

Effectively being a bot or worse is not the same thing as being a bot. Like Kolni wrote, WG isn't going to ban players for being bad or because somebody got salty. Isn't there a thread to vent these kinds of frustrations without starting a whole new one?