-
Content Count
757 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Platypusbill last won the day on November 18 2013
Platypusbill had the most liked content!
About Platypusbill
-
Rank
Recruits in General Chat
Profile Information
-
Gender
Not Telling
-
Location
Finland
-
Server
EU
Recent Profile Visitors
3,954 profile views
-
Most tanks will be harder to sidescrape against as they will now require sligthly sharper angles (the diagram WG posted states that a 122mm gun will ricoochet at ~74 degrees against 50mm of armour). ~150mm guns will, however, penetrate only up to ~76 degrees instead of 89.99999999 degrees.
-
Platypusbill reacted to a post in a topic: E-100 AP pen buff + Faillöwe buff
-
Well, they're angled at 80 degrees, and 3x overmatch apparently results in autobounce at 76 degrees, so they're immune in most situations. But TBH they are a pretty small portion of the frontal silhouette so it's not a major buff.
-
I'd like to point out that whilst 3x overmatch will be less potent than before (i.e. it only pushes the ricochet angle back to ~76 degrees instead of being basically autopen at any angle), the ricochet angle is actually being increased slightly for guns with less than 3x overmatch. Previously, 90mm and 122mm guns would ricochet at 70 degrees against 50mm of armour, but the diagram states that it would be 72/74 degrees under the new system. This means that sidescraping with thin (but not super thin) side armour is in fact more difficult against most opponents. Now, this is conjecture becau
-
Platypusbill reacted to a post in a topic: Maus Supertest Buffs
-
That information must be false, seeing as armour plates have been demonstrably overmatched by guns with a 3:1 calibre/thickness ratio.
-
What I meant by 150mm+ (am I misusing this?) is "150mm or more". Has it been ever been tested if 15cm guns are actully modeled as the real caliber of 149mm? If not, I'd appreciate it if someone tried it. I know Soviet 152s are actually 152,4mm, I ran a test where I shot at a 50,8mm (2 inch) plate at an extreme angle with a 152 derp and it penetrated. Some armour thicknesses originally measured in inches are rounded to whole millimeters, though.
-
RunninKurt reacted to a post in a topic: Strv 103b - Tier 10 TD
-
Platypusbill reacted to a post in a topic: Stridsvagn 74 (Tier 6 Medium Tank)
-
A boomstick with good accuracy would be ideal, yes. But I suppose it will be very vulnerable in general without terrain or distance to make it a more dificult target and to prevent easy tracking + flanking. Even if your opponent can't get around you, them being able to lock both your vehicle and gun in place with a shot to the tracks kind of sucks. BTW, its tier IX little brother is 18mm everywhere without spaced armour. Basically might as well be 1mm, except the extreme angles on the front do prevent guaranteed HE pens.
-
MacusFlash reacted to a post in a topic: Strv 103b - Tier 10 TD
-
DHP reacted to a post in a topic: Strv 103b - Tier 10 TD
-
Sapros reacted to a post in a topic: Strv 103b - Tier 10 TD
-
The armour model is available at gamemodels3d, just completed this evaluation of it. In short: -The entire front except a tiny cupola is immune to sub-120mm AP/APCR. -HEAT should only be used if you can't overmatch with AP/APCR, the effect of the spaced armour is substantial. You can penetrate a narrow section along the middle with HEAT, but tracking and flanking it is a better idea unless terrain/other enemies prevent this. -150mm+ guns can penetrate almost the entire front with AP/APCR. -120mm+ guns can penetrate the entire LFP, but only a small part of the UFP, with
-
Platypusbill reacted to a post in a topic: The IS3, so strong, it shapes meta?
-
Platypusbill reacted to a post in a topic: Individual Missions: A How-To Guide
-
Equanimity reacted to a post in a topic: t1 heavy big blob of fail?
-
HEAT has no normalisation, so it's 328mm even without the "premature detonation" effect of spaced armour. TL;DR yes it is.
-
EDIT: On the visual model, the cupola seems like a much more difficult target, so perhaps the thin sloped section would be the go-to target if you have sufficient penetration. The two areas marked with dotted lines are only 214-233 vs AP. They will of course become much stronger if they get additional angle from terrain, but perhaps it's easier to just hit the paper cupola anyway.
-
Small correction- the spaced armour on the UFP is only 14mm, however there is another 20mm welded on. The result being a 150mm main plate (263 eff) with another flat +14mm from the spaced armour (the effects of sloping being basically nonexistent due to the overmatch bonus rule).
-
Platypusbill reacted to a post in a topic: Is there some sort of proper review of the Weeaboo HTs?
-
Platypusbill reacted to a post in a topic: The Official Garbad Fan Club Thread
-
Platypusbill reacted to a post in a topic: O-I: Derp 2.0 - The Derpening
-
Platypusbill reacted to a post in a topic: The Official Garbad Fan Club Thread
-
Platypusbill reacted to a post in a topic: Karelia's Hill
-
Valan reacted to a post in a topic: T54E2 w/120mm and T-22SR models
-
ZXrage reacted to a post in a topic: T54E2 w/120mm and T-22SR models
-
KenadianCSJ reacted to a post in a topic: T54E2 w/120mm and T-22SR models
-
t___a reacted to a post in a topic: T54E2 w/120mm and T-22SR models
-
That's effective vs AP. It's what I use because it's the most commonly fired ammo type.
-
Checked out the armour model on gamemodels3d and did some number crunching. As with the Maus, you can shoot the front of the track at an angle to bypass the side skirt. This however is only worth it if it's heavily angled (>30 degrees), as this area is actually stronger on the VK100 (Maus has 25mm tracks for whatever reason) and the other parts of the tank are obviously not as well armoured. One good thing about the VK100 is that it's difficult to deal damage through the tracks from the side, as this area is 200mm thick in total.
-
T54E2 w/120mm and T-22SR models
Platypusbill replied to Platypusbill's topic in Upcoming Changes Discussion
To clarify, the T54E1 and T54E2 are autoloading and non-autoloading versions of the same project, both armed with the 105mm T140. However there was also a 120mm version of the E2, this was probably implemented by WG so it would be a bit more different from the normal M48 and fit tier X (the T140 would also be competitive, but it's AFAIK nerfed into the ground ingame compared to RL performance). -
andepans reacted to a post in a topic: T54E2 w/120mm and T-22SR models
-
T54E2 w/120mm and T-22SR models
Platypusbill replied to Platypusbill's topic in Upcoming Changes Discussion
Sorry, didn't have time to do everything before. Edited stats into OP.