Jump to content


WG.net Wiki Admin
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Haswell last won the day on July 9

Haswell had the most liked content!


About Haswell

  • Rank
    Wiki Wanker™

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Server

Recent Profile Visitors

24,553 profile views
  1. Is this literally an E25 chassis with a turret plonked on top? I cannot unsee this.
  2. https://web.archive.org/web/20181007113904/http://wiki.wnefficiency.net/pages/WN8:_Summary https://web.archive.org/web/20190219040340/http://wiki.wnefficiency.net/pages/WN8:_FAQ https://web.archive.org/web/20190108051058/https://wiki.wnefficiency.net/pages/WN8 Good enough.
  3. T54E1? Not that I'm interested in the replays, I just want to know your thoughts on how terribly powercreeped it became and if it's even T9 material anymore.
  4. Let's be honest, if you can already disable 3 maps right now, you'd make the same exact argument wishing you can disable 4 maps instead of 3.
  5. You know, when I requested the 263, I was hoping you'd ragequit instead of doing this. M103 next?
  6. I should have been more clear, I wasn't saying WG won't ban whales or any other paying customer just because they paid the SerB tax. Look at this from the other direction, what would happen if WG did ban all these shitters? Yes, gameplay experience for a lot of people MIGHT improve, but at the same time WG is also cutting off one of their revenue streams. A happy shitter is a paying shitter, and having paying shitters is a lot more important in the business sense than appeasing a smaller population of non-shitters (who are also paying customers anyway). It is very possible that non-shitters may be willing to invest more into the game if there are less shitters running around, but why would WG take that risk when they have perfectly healthy money streams right now? Also taking into account of the power of publicity and social media, if WG indeed goes forward with banning shitters but cannot handle the backlash, the negative publicity will potentially drive existing and future paying customers away, as well as putting huge amounts of pressure on the company when their efforts could be better spent on drumming up new ways to milk people dry. Shitters are loud and numerous, when they throw enough shit at the wall some will eventually stick and people will come to look at what all the fuss is about. Recall how blown up the Sir Foch incident became when WG EU took the proverbial slap to the face and got humiliated, now think how easy it will be to spin the story of WG banning shitters, "WG issue arbitrary mass bans for no broken rules". This is bad publicity that any game company will want to avoid. This isn't to say as long as you're a paying customer WG will be more lenient to you. Rather, WG wants to keep their current and future paying customers happy for milking. Shitters owning a bunch of prem tanks is a testament to how true the mantra of "happy shitters are paying shitters" is, WG understands that.
  7. He drops by every now and then, you'll catch him sooner or later.
  8. Aim time is already better than the IS-3 and nobody complains about the IS-3 having long aim time. And since when did accuracy ever mattered?
  9. Haswell

    Naval Action

    Do they actually have a non-barebones UI now?
  10. Sexually transmitted infection - intensified.
  • Create New...