Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'object'.
-
These days I just leave it for other people to deal with, but the armor on this is too silly for me to not make a thread. If I've not gotten too out of touch with WoT, this armor wouldn't be too out of place on a proper tier 10 heavy. I think when we first saw this, it only had a 90mm upper plate or something. Basically a weaker T-10 hull with an IS-6 turret and a stronger 122mm. Times have changed. It should be noted that I'm going off of line of sight thickness, not effective. I think the turret side was supposed to say 40°, but oh well. Even the flanks are
-
So i had this tank for over a few years now - i remember it being amazeballs...now it just seems to suck balls - especially after the alpha and camo nerfs. If I want alpha, i would go to my FV 183, if i want pinpoint accuracy, I would take my WTF100, and tbh, the armour seems only slightly better than my foch, with its awful aim time, but it's saving grace of 3 shells with the same alpha...and thats not even mentioning the other tanks out there that I dont own...for example the 263 which I now see more than the 268.....so is there a reason i should still keep this in my garage? how do you guys
-
I have no idea what's going on, but for some reason I'm doing a very, very good job of making sure that the Object 140 never, ever gets nerfed. Unfortunately, that's not the level of play that will be expected of me in CW, so I need to figure out what I'm doing wrong. However, being the moronic potato that I am, figuring out what's wrong and implementing changes are not coming quickly. I'm playing it almost exactly the same as my T-54, which I managed to somehow get a 57% winrate in, so I'm not sure how I'm managing a winrate that's 12% lower on what's basically a buffed T-54. Specifica