Jump to content
PityFool

The new meta and the T110E5: Diamond amongst the rocks? Or just simple salt?

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, MacusFlash said:

So it will be on pc version as well. Same was with M48. 

Blitz has 15% rng on pen and other differences and considering how idiotic Murazor is nothing is certain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, nabucodonsor said:

Blitz has 15% rng on pen and other differences and considering how idiotic Murazor is nothing is certain.

15% rng is against WG's policy on pc. Meanwhile cupolaless E5 fits into Murazor's powercreep balance. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, MacusFlash said:

15% rng is against WG's policy on pc. Meanwhile cupolaless E5 fits into Murazor's powercreep balance. 

But they do not plan on nerfing Jageru's pen or alpha as they did on blitz. I'd love to have a shaved E5 but frankly I dont see it coming. Just like Leo handling buff.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, nabucodonsor said:

But they do not plan on nerfing Jageru's pen or alpha as they did on blitz. I'd love to have a shaved E5 but frankly I dont see it coming. Just like Leo handling buff.

Do you remember the last real nerf on wot pc? It was to type 61 rear depression from -5 to -3. Every other nerf was about cutting down OP tanks. Right now patch notes contain nothing but buffs. 4 years ago it was full of both nerfs and buffs. 

Happy players do not like direct nerfing their tanks. So Murazor buffs everything. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, MacusFlash said:

Do you remember the last real nerf on wot pc? It was to type 61 rear depression from -5 to -3. Every other nerf was about cutting down OP tanks. Right now patch notes contain nothing but buffs. 4 years ago it was full of both nerfs and buffs. 

Happy players do not like direct nerfing their tanks. So Murazor buffs everything. 

ISU 152 got "rebalanced" which many consider it a nerf.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, nabucodonsor said:

ISU 152 got "rebalanced" which many consider it a nerf.

That was more to kickstart people to finish the line because they made the tier 8 the best tank in the line. 

How funny would it be to buff cuploa, nerf cupola, cut cupola off.  Logic.

Honestly, I see this as very unlikely.  Right now WG is trying to appeal to an existing playerbase, not new players.  Almost everybody already has the E5 so there is no profit to be gained in buffing a tank thats already in everybodys garage.  Its much more profitable to invent some mythical RU heavy that shits all over the E5 so that the E5 driver will grind out something new.

Besides, the Super Conq already shits on RU heavies, we can't have another capitalist imperialist pig dog tank pissing all over tanks literally named after lord and master Stalin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So this is only the second tier 10 in which I've gotten a MoE, but to get it on this battle is surely some kind of sign that the really good players aren't playing it all that much:

mLYhkaY.png

I realize it's only one mark, but to get over the hump based on a battle with 1264 combined...in a tier 10 heavy?  WTF?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

WG rolling back all proposed buffs to live stats, except dispersion on tracks, which are getting a nerf compared to current stats.
Guess E5 is a bit too OP currently.
 

T110E5:
Increased dispersion during movement from 0.14 m to 0.18 m;
Increased dispersion during hull rotation from 0.14 m to 0.18 m;
Increased dispersion at maximum vehicle speed from 5.18 m to 6.66 m;
Increased dispersion at maximum vehicle rotation speed from 4.38 m to 5.63 m;
Increased dispersion during turret rotation from 0.06 m to 0.08 m;
Increased dispersion during turret rotation at maximum speed from 2.00 to 2.67 m.
120 mm Gun M58:
Gun reload time increased from 8.44 to 9.59 s;
The rate of fire changed from 7.11 to 6.26 rounds/minute;
The average damage per minute changed from 2845 to 2503;
The average damage per minute for HE shells changed from 3662 to 3222.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, CandyVanMan said:

WG rolling back all proposed buffs to live stats, except dispersion on tracks, which are getting a nerf compared to current stats.
Guess E5 is a bit too OP currently.
 

T110E5:
Increased dispersion during movement from 0.14 m to 0.18 m;
Increased dispersion during hull rotation from 0.14 m to 0.18 m;
Increased dispersion at maximum vehicle speed from 5.18 m to 6.66 m;
Increased dispersion at maximum vehicle rotation speed from 4.38 m to 5.63 m;
Increased dispersion during turret rotation from 0.06 m to 0.08 m;
Increased dispersion during turret rotation at maximum speed from 2.00 to 2.67 m.
120 mm Gun M58:
Gun reload time increased from 8.44 to 9.59 s;
The rate of fire changed from 7.11 to 6.26 rounds/minute;
The average damage per minute changed from 2845 to 2503;
The average damage per minute for HE shells changed from 3662 to 3222.

It's hard to use any other term than retarded for that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, CandyVanMan said:

I wonder how much glue they are huffing in Minsk....

I don't even think it's that. Knowing corporate structures I'm pretty sure the cut the budgets on the balance team and hired people without experience or they have a moronic hiring process and hire stupid people. It seems they don't focus on rebalancing the game anymore. They are just churning out new stuff to monetize the game (and I know that's the plan). 

I'd also bet they are behaving in reactionary ways while mostly trying to cater to RU market (even though EU earns way more pay player and maybe even earns more but that's theory crafting) so it's often not data but trying to chase what people want which is an idiotic way to do product design. That way we would never get smartphones, probably wouldn't get VOD. You have to predict what people will want not trying to listen to clueless customer complaints (not to mention this means you are being ruled by survivorship bias)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...