Jump to content
tajj7

9.13 tanks Super Test Notes

Recommended Posts

On 21/11/2015, 09:35:01, HEI_BK201 said:

I only saw 4 Chi-Ris in 1 week the hell you talking about? ._. also Chi-Ris are really easy to kill..

Was joking, nvm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So I'm presuming Pershing goes from 180 average pen to 190, T-44/T-54 proto goes from 175 to 183 average pen? 

Odd way to express pen buffs. 

Also how come the 59-Patton doesn't get a pen buff? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/22/2015, 10:41:48, Acumen said:

Pretty sure Leo 1's amo rack sits behind the upper front pate.

Pretty sure?!

Leo 1 has whole front made of ammo racks with seat for driver.

To demonstrate:

post-242068-0-25330900-1436051523.jpg

Tho in WoT it might be less realistic, but whole front is basically made from shells.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, hall0 said:

Maybe  special matchmaking. 

Sorry derp on my part, meant the 59-Patton, doesn't it have the same gun as the T95E2 and the T69 essentially? 

 

Pretty sure in Warthunders if you put less shells in the tank you are less likely to have the ammo hit. Also that in game tank viewer is awesome in Warthunder no idea why WG haven't tried to copy it. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, tajj7 said:

Sorry derp on my part, meant the 59-Patton, doesn't it have the same gun as the T95E2 and the T69 essentially?

They're probably ignoring the 59-Patton because they "don't have enough data yet". It's already stinking up my expected value tables though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 hours ago, no_name_cro said:

Pretty sure?!

Leo 1 has whole front made of ammo racks with seat for driver.

To demonstrate:

 

Tho in WoT it might be less realistic, but whole front is basically made from shells.

WoT does have saving throws for hits to modules like the ammo rack as well

23 hours ago, tajj7 said:

Sorry derp on my part, meant the 59-Patton, doesn't it have the same gun as the T95E2 and the T69 essentially? 

It does yes, but it's technically a different entity

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/21/2015, 7:55:24, aaveq said:

T-34-3 always will be poor mans type59 :serb:

worse hull armor

worse turret armor

even worse AP pen + sHEET ammo as prem

less accurate, worse aim time

still worse gun depression

 

seems equal :QBFlip:

 

 

Type shits on everything.

But at least if you trade shots with 240/250 alpha tanks you always win with the T-34-3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...