Jump to content
zapyoug

Masochism thread

Recommended Posts

Nooooo wayyyyyyy... This box has zero redeeming features other than armour. Even sidescraping gets the cheeks shot at. I suffered massive AIDS doing this one, its over and done.

(Does the Tier 8 count too? Although it is quite strong in my opinion, many people seem to curse it.)

9M72NiD.jpg

7lZVnOm.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, _Violence_ said:

Nooooo wayyyyyyy... This box has zero redeeming features other than armour. Even sidescraping gets the cheeks shot at. I suffered massive AIDS doing this one, its over and done.

(Does the Tier 8 count too? Although it is quite strong in my opinion, many people seem to curse it.)

9M72NiD.jpg

7lZVnOm.jpg

Tier 8 definitely counts; most people consider it utter trash and way worse than the tier 9.

Tier 10 is also a POS so there is that as well

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Still am not convinced that the tier 8 is POS. Done in 77 battles. :)

TJLIaKE.jpg

9xgfgRW.jpg

On 5/13/2018 at 2:04 AM, BedakCoa said:

Question from green plateau player(or however you write/spell that), do T28/T95 and Churchill GC still count in SM thread for 3 marking? :serb:

T28 got a model remake, making it more defensive than the older model. (Maybe it still is?)

T95 should really count, but the speed buff made it possible to keep up with HTs very easily.

Churchill GC is a definite yes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm basically a corpse so haha what even is my opinion but the t28 was bad largely due to comically inaccurate gun forcing it to close range where its armor that only worked if it was directly pointed at someone was ineffective and easilly abused due to potato speed. idk what exact changes were but it would still be pretty trash even if the front armor was upgraded above "decoration"

T95 seems like speed buff is counteracted by permanently being reduced to a 50% crew.

and yes, gc is still a poor brittish mans house put on treads and told to lob potatos at kv2s 

@BedakCoa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i mean to be fair carbon was doing 3k in the 110 back in the day.. it was good it just didn't have the characteristics to stay relevant with how the game developed.. i did enjoy the tank back then but i'd certainly not enjoy it now

pretty sure garbad ranked the 110 above the is3 which was just never true at any point :serb: 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/13/2020 at 2:36 PM, _Violence_ said:

Even IS-3 pre-buff worked better than the 110. The only thing as weak as 110 is IS-5 and probably both KV-4s.

 

15 hours ago, kolni said:

i mean to be fair carbon was doing 3k in the 110 back in the day.. it was good it just didn't have the characteristics to stay relevant with how the game developed.. i did enjoy the tank back then but i'd certainly not enjoy it now

pretty sure garbad ranked the 110 above the is3 which was just never true at any point :serb: 

Having nearly perfect frontal protection against 200-220 pen guns with some durability against 250 pen tier 9 guns used to be busted before pen creep and prem spam became a thing. Factor in the fact that the IS-3 had not yet got its HD megabuff, the 110 was one of the best armoured and fastest tier 8 heavies of its day.

The old articles on wotlabs have gone, but there was a pretty good argument for the 110 being one of the best heavies in tier back in 2012?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

t32 suffered the same fate as the 110 and that was a better tank at almost everything in my eyes outside of knifefighting (better than it with small gun, worse with large)

110 had gun handling going for it and a stronger beak but a complete lack of troll armour and in a meta where aim spread was far more centered so that honestly didn't matter much

the 110 walked a pretty fine line in terms of relevance but as soon as it had its strengths questioned it fell of a cliff harder than anything in the tier

(panther 88 and t343 excluded)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/14/2020 at 2:53 PM, lavawing said:

The old articles on wotlabs have gone, but there was a pretty good argument for the 110 being one of the best heavies in tier back in 2012?

Unfortunately I was caught playing the 110 in 2019, so it had to compete with other troll HTs released in 2018 onwards and maybe even the T26E5. 110 wouldn't even catch up with some MTs due to lacking power to weight and terrain resistance. When Chrysler K was a thing, the end of the older HTs became nearer than anyone else would expect.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...