Kaga is for sale?

[BiggieD61 364]

How hard is it for Wargaming to change the load out of the Ranger to make it competitive - it's not even close  compared to the Saipan or Hiryu. It's not the Kaga skewing it either, the "all time" numbers for the Ranger are just as bad.

[Rodrigopine 184]

Yeah I don't even play carriers but I see these numbers being pretty lopsided and I think the Ranger needs some tweaks to make it viable.

[Jaegaer 180]

WG already said they want to change CV play by doing away with the two modes (alt-attack and potatoe-attack) and imho thats the right way. Then they need to change/remove fixed loadouts too.

[Madner Kami 405]

Removing manual attacks would be stupid though, as they offer a tactical layer, for example torping angry smokes (noone ever expects a carrier doing that, but that is exactly what carriers are there for, among other things; all the more hilarious if the sunk smoker calls hax) or punishing still-standing targets really hard. They just need to reign in the superiorty of manual drops against automatic drops, by simply increasing the arming time of air-dropped torpedoes, for example. There's no need to make rocket-science out of carrier-balancing.