Jump to content
Caomhanach

Most Skippable Russian Vehicles

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, simba90 said:

Is the T100lt really considered bad now? I know it is outclassed by that fucking wheeled piece of shit but it is still #2 in tier right?

Why would you play it though? Even if it is #2 it is still bad when compared to any tier x. 

I have it and its just a bad obj 140 due to the gun being so unreliable and having way less hp. And while it's fast it isnt a wheelchair.  

So it's just a tank that fails at being a medium and a scout that fails at scouting

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, nabucodonsor said:

Why would you play it though? Even if it is #2 it is still bad when compared to any tier x. 

I have it and its just a bad obj 140 due to the gun being so unreliable and having way less hp. And while it's fast it isnt a wheelchair.  

So it's just a tank that fails at being a medium and a scout that fails at scouting

It doesn't fail at scouting cmon, EBR won't get as much use as a T-100 in powerful passive scouting positions like on Malvinovka, and the advantage that T-100 has over the other lights is being able to get to more aggressive spots, almost like an EBR can.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, Ham_ said:

It doesn't fail at scouting cmon, EBR won't get as much use as a T-100 in powerful passive scouting positions like on Malvinovka, and the advantage that T-100 has over the other lights is being able to get to more aggressive spots, almost like an EBR can.

And an EBR can simply rush you, spot and run circles around you while half of your team fails at hitting it. True its good at scouting but the bs that an EBR can pull off is too much.

If a team gets a car and the other doesnt the team with the car wins.The EBR is that much better than any of its competitors.

Also the EBR has a much better gun than any tier x light tank as it can leverage much better the lack of pen by just being way better at flanking due to its incredible mobility. Furthermore the view range difference is just 11% and can be capped to 430 which is enough to spot as cars are so good at getting close to the enemy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Tupinambis said:

Isn't the SU-101 just the WZ-120G FT, but worse?

That's like saying isn't the t44 just the 44100 but worse.

Comparing anything to one of wg's broken prems doesn't really tell you much. Just that it isn't as broken.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Ezz said:

That's like saying isn't the t44 just the 44100 but worse.

Comparing anything to one of wg's broken prems doesn't really tell you much. Just that it isn't as broken.

44 is equal to the 44 100 tho - they reach similar speeds on similar terrain terrain resistances notwithstanding - 100 is more accurate - base 44 doesn't get engine damage/fires since they forgot to buff the 100's engine HP when they gave it the base 44's HP/T.

The 101 is just flat out worse than the WZ, even if it isn't bad, just clunky

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The point was that they were similar flavours of tank with the post 2015 prem being better than the tree equivalent. And yeah on reflection I think I was comparing to when the 44 hasn't been buffed yet but the gun handling alone is a big advantage for its play style. Either way there are lots of similar issues with prems and it's not like the 101 is a tvp vtu.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/25/2020 at 5:06 AM, Ham_ said:

KV-3, KV-4, well you don't want to get the IS-4 or ST-II in the first place.

430 II, but K-91 is also trash so why bother.

T-43, maybe T-44 are the only remaining mediocre tanks. Rest of the mediums are obviously awesome.

IS-7, 277 are awesome lines start to finish, maybe the IS if you can't make it work.

705 kinda sucks compared to the other heavies.

SU-101 and 263 are good but you need to enjoy the play style of the line.

KV3 should get nice buffs to make it nice.

K91 line is all trash except for 416 but that is not as good as it was.

T44 imho is not even mediocre. it's good. It just takes module damage.

15 hours ago, Tupinambis said:

Isn't the SU-101 just the WZ-120G FT, but worse?

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY Worse.

Su 101 has:

- 700 less dpm

- 150mps slower shells

- 0.05 worse accuracy

- 3 degrees less gun dep

- Worse gun placement

- 1/2 the traverse speed

- Worse armor

- 30m less vr

In return it gets good gun soft stats and is slightly really slightly faster in a straight line. 

It's like saying a 50kg kid on his first day in a gym is basically a worse Chris Hemsworth.  Well technically he is but is it a valid comparison?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...