Jump to content
Porphyrogennete

CS-63 requirement seems too high

Recommended Posts

First off, WoTLabs is no longer in charge of updating WN8, you'll have to ask the XVM team.

Second off, we already have a thread for your WN8 question: 

Thirdly, what the hell did you expect? It's only been like 2 days since the patch came out, of course only good players have it and skew the mean expected values. If the algorithm is only being fed good performance (most of the CS-63 gameplay are good players who could afford to rush it), it's going to think that good perforance is the average gameplay for the tank.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, ZXrage said:

First off, WoTLabs is no longer in charge of updating WN8, you'll have to ask the XVM team.

Second off, we already have a thread for your WN8 question: 

Thirdly, what the hell did you expect? It's only been like 2 days since the patch came out, of course only good players have it and skew the mean expected values. If the algorithm is only being fed good performance (most of the CS-63 gameplay are good players who could afford to rush it), it's going to think that good perforance is the average gameplay for the tank.

This is my first time going for a tank that is new on day 1 , did not consider this at all . Thanks for the response , I understand now .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...