deetz 162 Share Posted February 10, 2014 This just randomly popped into my head just now. It's been mentioned before that you can't have exact 1000 battle stats because of how WG handles it, so why not base recent stats by something like, your last 60 sessions? The only big problem I can think of right now would be people playing a couple battles for every session, so perhaps have a minimum number of battles for the sessions to be over. Like, past 60 sessions + however more needed to go over 500/whatever battles. With this you get stats that don't end up weird for people who don't play much as well as a sort of even playing field. I can't really think of any advantages over the current way, but I just wonder how it could be better. Also I had no idea where to post this, so I put it here. Link to post Share on other sites
Evroz621 261 Share Posted February 10, 2014 Forum suggestions section would have worked. Link to post Share on other sites
Eagle_Peak 73 Share Posted February 11, 2014 Like, past 60 sessions + however more needed to go over 500/whatever battles. Instead of this why don't you just use past 500 battles instead and keep # sessions separate? Link to post Share on other sites
Barrowton 0 Share Posted February 11, 2014 hey mate use Vbaddict ADU dosier, it very helpfor to keep track of mounts of information Link to post Share on other sites
.gif.836e07170550a946ba799a2e7540a9d6.thumb.gif.d9aaff08d3c94f9c63f6f0443bca7976.gif)
